Re: Link problem, must be simple

OK, it was simple. Really, if the samples documented their dependencies with full includes (rather than having the minimal set of includes), this wouldn't have killed me. I'm not used to gcc's error messages, so I didn't realize I needed to check and see if those functions were inline, which

Link problem, must be simple

Hello, I'm back, with a silly problem where I must be overlooking something since the samples link. I can't resolve some symbols, and I don't understand why. Again, I'm using gcc 3.0.3, and here is my link line and its output: (link cmd, hopefully it will be readable): /usr/local/gcc-3.0.3/b

Re: Newby problem with Xerces and gcc3

I solved the problem, it was a misunderstanding of the platform. I was using the -shared flag (I thought that was equivalent to the solaris flag -dynamic). I don't know what was exactly the matter, I'll have to look into what that flag does exactly later, but that's what was screwing me up.

little orthograph mistake....?

this is an error I receive from a non-validating parser: "unparsed entitty references, 'unpent', not valid here" I believe it's "entity" and not "entitty"... very little mistake, a little bit annoying... thanks. Jeff. __

Newby problem with Xerces and gcc3

Hello I am a newby linux developer, and am having a few problems integrating xerces inot my project. I have successfully used xerces before on the solaris platform, but that was some time ago. As the archives appear to be unavailable, I could not search them for similar problems, if I hav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2869] - AIX 4.3.3 64-bit mutex/atomic-operation changes for build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6856] New: - SAX Parser dumping core after parsing invalid xml doc

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Where to look for future release plans and details?

We don't have such information in place right now.  BUT as discussed in another thread few weeks earlier, we ARE working on that.   We plan to create a file called 'RELEASE-PLAN' in CVS.   (I didn't forget about that :->)   This should happen soon.  Stay tuned.   Tinny     - Original Me

Where to look for future release plans and details?

Please, where can I find information about plans for future releases of Xerces-C? I'm interested in information such as when such a release might happen, and what fixes / features will the new version contain?   I'm about to embark on the effort to build Xerces under CygWin, and after readin

Re: XML Schemas Validation

I use rxp. On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Fernando Jeronymo wrote: > > > ok... maybe you have a point here. > > Is there any other validator I could use to check this? > > > > |+---> > || John Utz | > || || ish.com>

Re: XML Schemas Validation

ok... maybe you have a point here. Is there any other validator I could use to check this? |+---> || John Utz | || | || | || 03/04/2002 | || 11:23 AM |

Re: Xerces-C++ for Solaris 8

Good luck. It probably won't work. Here are the list of stumbling blocks you'll have to overcome to get it to "seem" to work. If you use iostreams w/GCC, it definitely won't be stable. 1) The pre-built binary on the apache site is built with Forte C++. It won't link with g++. The name m

Re: XML Schemas Validation

you might consider that you have it backwards :-) perhaps XMLSpy sez things are good that really arent. just something to think about. johnu On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Fernando Jeronymo wrote: > > > Hi, I am having some problems trying to validate a xml file. > > It seems that Xerces C++ just has

Re: XML Schemas Validation

The version of xerces C++ I am using is : 1.6.0 The error I get when I try to validate is: "Attribute 'type' cannot appear in local attribute declarations" "Ref is present, and type/form/type found" "'Annotation' and 'Annotation' violate the Unique Particle Attribution rule." "Global element '

Re: XML Schemas Validation

Which version of Xerces-C++ are you using? Tinny - Original Message - From: "Fernando Jeronymo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:18 AM Subject: XML Schemas Validation > > > Hi, I am having some problems trying to validate a xml file. > > It see

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6834] - apparently correct schema/instance not validating

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

XML Schemas Validation

Hi, I am having some problems trying to validate a xml file. It seems that Xerces C++ just has a subset of the W3C schema validation. I wonder if Xerces Java has everything? Problem is, I use XML Spy whitch has the full implementation for schemas validation, and my xml files are validating aga

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6840] - There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: problem compiling samples

I don't think cygwin is supported by the stock Xerces distribution. Others have put some effort into porting. Try searching the mail archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev for "cygwin". -Original Message- From: Hrishikesh Bhagwat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

Xerces-C++ for Solaris 8

Hi, I am using the gcc-2.95.3 for solaris 8.0. I will go to get to use the Xerces-C++ library in my applications? Thank you, flavio E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Yahoo! Empregos O trabalho dos seus

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6840] New: - There is not a complete functional mapping between the particles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

problem compiling samples

hi, i m trying to compile SAX2Count.cpp (a sample that comes with) Xerces parser, using the following command. C:\xerces6\samples\SAX2Count>g++ -Ic:\xerces6\include SAX2Count.cpp In file included from c:/xerces6/include/util/XercesDe