recurrent errors in overloading stream insertion operator

Hi everyone, I just have a small but annoying C++ problem. It has to do with Xerces imported code, but I have experienced it, before, so I kind of doubt that it is a problem with the actual code. If this is an inappropriate question for this forum, please ignore. When copying and pasting the f

SAX2 External Schema ?

Hello Apparently, when I set the external schema for the sax2 parser it assumes that path is relative to the location of the xml document I am attempting to parse. This is extremely annoying behavior, is this correct? Basically this means I have to reset the schema anytime I want to parse

Re: Patches for Xerces-C 1.7.0

Please open a bugzilla bug. Just attach the diffs is fine. Thanks! Tinny - Original Message - From: "Dawkins, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:21 AM Subject: Patches for Xerces-C 1.7.0 > Our development practises mean that we compile

Xerces-c 1.7 on Tru64 Unix

Hi, Who could help me where i find xerces-c (1.7 or 1.6) binaries for Compaq Tru64 Unix? Thanx A.Rado [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: adv of xerces?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But just to choose a product because it is open source ? I dont know ..? It may surprise you, but there are many people for whom the distinction between free software (in the GNU sense) and closed, proprietary software is more important than a technical feature list.

RE: adv of xerces?

Gee, I pretty much assume that in any comparison with a Microsoft product. I guess when you ask for a comparison of Xerces to MSXML most people are going to assume you only care about Windows. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7022] - DOMString::transcode ( and XMLString::transcode() ) fails on SuSE LINUX 7.3 for non UTF-8 Strings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: parser

Make sure you pass the parser an InputSource (I think you'll need the MemBufInputSource) when you want to send the parser straight XML. So, you'll have DOMParser parser; // set parser attrs MemBufInputSource is( (XMLByte *)xmlstring, ... ); // don't recall the constructor args; look them up p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7087] - compiler warnings when using gcc

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7087] New: - compiler warnings when using gcc

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Xerces C++ for Mac download link

Chad, Xerces C++ for the Macintosh is available in source form, with three varieties of projects available to build it yourself. It is not yet available in binary form. Follow the link below for the Xerces source download of either a stable or nightly snapshot. Or download the bleeding edge from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7022] - DOMString::transcode ( and XMLString::transcode() ) fails on SuSE LINUX 7.3 for non UTF-8 Strings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: adv of xerces?

What are you looking for? Performance benchmarks, compliance tests, responsiveness of the support team to bug reports, features, ...? Last I'd heard Xerces stacks up respectably well in all areas, but I don't know of a document which attempts to do a complete summary of the current state of both.

FW: Xerces C++ for Mac download link

Not acked... -- Forwarded Message > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:37:35 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Xerces C++ for Mac download link > > Webmaster, > > I can't find a link on your website to download Xerces C++ for Macintosh, > yet it says that it is avail

Re: adv of xerces?

You all say that, -it is really stable, -supports most plattforms and compiler, -it is standard conform, -there is a good documentation, -there is great support, -there is still improvement (IDOM, DOM3), -the developer are available by mail etc., -there is permanent bugfixing, -source available,

RE: Xerces-c

Hello, can somebody help me? As a project I have to make a paper about Xerces-c... therefore I would like to have a couple of answers: - which w3c implements Xerces-c ? Xerces is open source. Everybody that wants to contributes. The Apache Software Foundation is coordinating the efforts of many.

RE: adv of xerces?

Can you modify MSXML... ?... No! Sid -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2002 9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: adv of xerces? >>What are the advantages of using Xercesc over MSXML 4.0?:p> > > > Xerces-C is open

RE: adv of xerces?

Well said. I was polishing my own answer to this, but you said it better :P Regards Erik Rydgren Mandarinen systems AB Sweden -Original Message- From: Ian Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 13 mars 2002 11:39 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: adv of xerces? That's a matter

RE: adv of xerces?

That's a matter of opinion. For me xerces is fantastic, and a major part of that is the open-sourceness. While you would hope that any 3rd party software you use is bug free and does everything you could hope for it often isn't so open source means: - that if you simple must get 'x' fixed/chang

Xerces-c

Hello, can somebody help me? As a project I have to make a paper about Xerces-c... therefore I would like to have a couple of answers: - which w3c implements Xerces-c ? - advantages of Xerces-c ? - disadvantages of Xerces-c ? - maybe some information in general I can use Thanx for the help... Ro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7077] New: - ICUMsgLoader doesn't load messages!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Patches for Xerces-C 1.7.0

Our development practises mean that we compile with nearly all warnings on. Consequently, I've just spent two days* patching xerces** to fix the following warnings: - Calling base class initializers explicitly for copy constructors - Commenting out unused variables and arguments - Reorderin

Re: adv of xerces?

>>What are the advantages of using Xercesc over MSXML 4.0?:p> > > > Xerces-C is open source, MSXML is not. > If this is the only one this is nothing. Adib. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7074] - Unwarranted error regarding "no circular definitions allowed"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7074] - Unwarranted error regarding "no circular definitions allowed"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7074] - Unwarranted error regarding "no circular definitions allowed"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7074] New: - Unwarranted error regarding "no circular definitions allowed"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7072] New: - Documentation for XMLString::transcode states invalid return value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu