DOMSerializer and extracting a CString

1) I wonder if somebody could email me  a working version of DOMSerializer(both DOMSerializer.cpp and DOMSerializer.hpp). I am using Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0.  There is something wrong with the files which are available for download. I can not compile them. I beleive the errors were cause

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7346] New: - Invalid uriId used for XMLAttr:s in XMLScanner.cpp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7341] New: - Missing newline at end of util and DOM source files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

xml c++ parser for solaris 2.5

Hello, Is there any version of XML C++ parser that I can use under solaris 2.5 with work shop CC compiler version 4.2 The latest version is for 2.6 for Forte C++ Version 6. Thanks, Rajesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7164] - DOMParser with a DTD leak!

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7297] - validation of schema included in document fails with improper error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sources for Unix...

Several people have already replied to your previous posting, stating that you must use gtar to untar the archive on Solaris. Are you sure you're using gtar? This is also a FAQ: http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-distrib.html#faq-11 Dave

Sources for Unix...

I have unzipped xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar.gz on Windows 2000 and I can see that the source files are there. On SunOS 5.8 I must have the wrong tar or something. Regards, Daniela. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

RE: Static library on Solaris?

I used g++ v3.0.4. I was just about to mention this: :-) Steve Hespelt says: > with the Sun workshop compilers, you have to use > CC -xar instead of ar to build static libraries. David > -Original Message- > From: Scott Nesbitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 March 2002 17:4

RE: Static library on Solaris?

with the Sun workshop compilers, you have to use CC -xar instead of ar to build static libraries. > -Original Message- > From: Scott Nesbitt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Static library on Solaris? > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7336] New: - 3 minor issues with C++ Builder (ver 5.02) build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Static library on Solaris?

Did you compile with the Sun compiler or the GNU compiler? I used CC: Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 C++ 5.2 2000/09/11 and then tried the Sun ar and the GNU ar, both without success. Scott Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] >I have been able to do this successfully, with no modifications >other than to f

Sources for Unix...

I have downloaded xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar.gz and followed the installation instructions found on the apache website. I use SunOS 5.8 and the following to unzip/untar: gunzip xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar.gz tar -xvf xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar I have also set the environment variable XERCESCROOT and the LD_LIBR

xerces-c_1.lib

Do I need to have xerces-c_1.lib under winnt\systems32 dir? Or can I just include it in my MSDEV proj settings folder where the project is, and it should take care of it? Please let me know - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

RE: Static library on Solaris?

I have been able to do this successfully, with no modifications other than to fix (a lot of) compiler warnings. We just used the GNU "ar" tool to create the library as usual. David > -Original Message- > From: Scott Nesbitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 March 2002 15:34 > To: [E

Static library on Solaris?

I would like to create a static library of xerces-c version 1.7 on Solaris. I compile normally, then ran ar and created the .a library from the object files. Unfortunately when I tried to link against the library I got numerous errors. This worked with version 1.3. Are there build instruction

problem building the samples.

Hello, I have downloaded binaries for xerces-c-1_7_0 for Solaris CC. I am having troube building the samples. The error messages that I get is during the linking phase. Since the configure script is already created I did not run it. What am I doing wrong? The errors are as follows:

RE: msvcrtd.dll

The project uses msvcrt.dll for the release configuration and msvcrtd.dll for the debug configuration. If you insert this project into some of your other workspaces (with projects that use the Multi-threaded DLL version of the C run time library), MSVC will auto-magically use the release version

RE: msvcrtd.dll

I am using release version of the project in MSDEV. Can I replace msvcrd.dll by msvcrt.dll? How can I use it statically? Please provide details, as I am new to it. Thanks -Original Message- From: Dave Hoffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL P

RE: msvcrtd.dll

Yes, I think it does. If this is a problem, which it was for us, you can edit the project to use static libraries and rebuild. -Original Message- From: Bavishi, Pankaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: msvcrtd.dll Does x

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7316] New: - DOM_Range Class Lacks a copy constructor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: IDOM memory model

Martin, I am looking to do something very similar to that proposed by Jason, but looking at the current v1.7.0 code base I can't make sense of your code below. Won't calling delete on fDocument in giveDocument() delete the memory of what you are about to return? I think the code should look somet