DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8125] - Can't build on AIX with runConfigure -tnone, stricmp undefined

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DOM 3 Patches?

Hi Jason, I have implemented everything except for fixing the IDOM memory model to not grow uncontrollably. My only performance test to this point has been to compare IDOMCount and DOMCount and found that they take the same amount of time. You had earlier pointed me to the xmlbench tests that A

Re: Linux shared library naming convention adopted

"Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > Ok, this confuses me. If it is a **MAJOR** release when are you > changin the minor version number? I would think that you would change > the major version number. > I guess, the major version is ** RESERVED ** for architectural change, and that is why we have

Re: DOM 3 Patches?

"Lenny Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been working on a write up that describes my view of the > Xerces DOM, it is not complete yet, but since I haven't heard from > you on your position, I have included it below so that you and > anyone else interested can comment. Lenny, Have

RE: DOM 3 Patches?

Hi Tinny, How is your review of the DOM-IDOM integration going? Remember that has an impact on the decision to standardize on IDOM as the Xerces implementation. Also, when you last posted that you were considering on standardizing on IDOM there was quite a bit of discussion regarding the danger

Re: DOM 3 Patches?

"Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Are you willing to accept patches for DOM level 3 implementations > > Yes, but one second ... > > Remember sometimes ago I've post a Apache C++ DOM Binding proposal? I am > now reviewing the comment and trying to reorganize the IDOM (e.g. rename > IDOM

Re: DOM 3 Patches?

Jason. > Are you willing to accept patches for DOM level 3 implementations Yes, but one second ... Remember sometimes ago I've post a Apache C++ DOM Binding proposal? I am now reviewing the comment and trying to reorganize the IDOM (e.g. rename IDOM_DOMXXX to DOMXXX as discussed, this also matc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8125] - Can't build on AIX with runConfigure -tnone, stricmp undefined

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8125] New: - Can't build on AIX with runConfigure -tnone, stricmp undefined

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DOM 3 Patches?

Hey Tinny et. al., Are you willing to accept patches for DOM level 3 implementations in IDOM? I'd really like to add support for the new 'encoding', 'version', and 'standalone' attributes of DOM_Document. That way I can handle XML declarations properly. What say you? Thanks, jas. -

RE: Sax Parser on VxWorks

Hi Amit, Thanks for the additional insight. I'm not using the -mlongcall compiler switch but nonetheless have experieinced CC2.7.2 compiler crashes, particularly in some of the schema source. I was able to eliminate some of the compiler crashes by "simplifying" (e.g. splitting a compound C++ sta

RE: Sax Parser on VxWorks

Hello Dennis, Thanks for the reply. I tried doing that, but only one person answered and that didnt help much; nothing from the GNU people themselves. But I discovered the problem late friday evening. And this might be helpful to others too. Our build file was using the flag "-mlongcall" alongwi

Re: No XML Decl nodes in IDOM

"David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not in DOM Level 2. There will be in DOM level 3, as calls on the > Document interface: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-DOM-Level-3-Core-20020409/core.html#i-Document > Ok. Thanks David. jas. --

RE: Sax Parser on VxWorks

Hi Shah, Perhaps you could try reposting this to a GNU CC users forum. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Shah Amit-ASHAH3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sax Parser on VxWorks Hello, Irrespective of whatever version of Xerc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5563] - Add capacity to build Xerces as static library

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Access Violation

Hi,       I am getting a access violation error while executing the line.       errorMessages = new ValueVectorOf(30);       I will appreciate if you help me out of this.   Regards Irfan