any plans to support selectsinglenode/selectnodes

Does anyone know if there are any plans to support these 2 functions in the c++/win32 version of xerces? thanks, cp __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9468] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9468] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: undefined symbol error

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:12:18PM -0400, Michael Grabenstein wrote: > > On Friday, May 24, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Robert Schiele wrote: > > >On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:30:57PM -0400, Michael Grabenstein wrote: > >>Two guesses: > >>1) LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to be set to include the correct > >li

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9468] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9468] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9465] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Standalone SAX parser?

As it happens, our app uses SAX to parse documents and DOM to construct them, so we pull in pretty much everything. In theory, if we didn't use the DOM stuff, the linker would omit it. Even if this is the case, this approach makes less efficient use of system resources than a DLL, because other ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9468] New: - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Standalone SAX parser?

"Brendan Reville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You may need to define what you mean by "standalone SAX parser." > > We have an > > app that statically links Xerces and uses the SAX parser. (Mind you, it's > > based on a very old version of Xerces.) Is that what you mean? > > The ultimate goal

RE: Standalone SAX parser?

> You may need to define what you mean by "standalone SAX parser." > We have an > app that statically links Xerces and uses the SAX parser. (Mind you, it's > based on a very old version of Xerces.) Is that what you mean? The ultimate goal is to avoid a half-meg overhead in application size, when

Re: undefined symbol error

On Friday, May 24, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Robert Schiele wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:30:57PM -0400, Michael Grabenstein wrote: >> Two guesses: >> 1) LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to be set to include the correct > libstdc++.so >> ( you must be finding an older copy). > > Huh? No! XMI2SSLHandl

Re: dumb simple data types question

Sorry for the confusion. It turns out that the example that I have been basing some of my code upon (SEnumVal) actually spits out the wrong string values instead of using the schema symbols constants. Sorry about that. I am updating my source to use the schema symbols constants instead. Bob

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9465] - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9465] New: - Memory Leak in SAX Parser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: dumb simple data types question

Bob, I am little bit confused. Xerces-C has the datatype string constants in SchemaSymbols as defined in the spec (i.e. fgDT_DECIMAL = "decimal"). Xerces-C does not have 'Decimal' as a string constant. However, Decimal is an enumeration value (ValidatorType) in DatatypeValidator. Khaled Robert

Saving and restoring an IDOM_Document object from a binary file

Team Xerces, My real-time embedded Xerces application must restore on power-up the IDOM_Document objects that it had before being powered-off, and doesn't have time at start-up to re-parse them. How can an IDOM_Document object (obtained by parsing XML text) be saved to a binary file and later res

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9460] New: - DOMParser segmentation fault when reading from MemBufInputSource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tinny: 1.8 release plans ?

If you need any help with these particular items I cite, let me know. If someone reviewed them, and then let me check them in, that may save you the hassle of doing all the leg work. Let me know at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Bob At 09:52 AM 5/28/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Bob, > > > How might on

Re: Tinny: 1.8 release plans ?

Bob, > How might one inquire whether they will be included in the next release? Only those bugs that have moved to "REESOLVE FIXED" status (since last release date) will be included in the coming release. We don't really have "plan" for fixing bugzilla bugs. We normally will review them when w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3399] - Error in SAXException::getMessage

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Tinny: 1.8 release plans ?

Tinny, Thanks for the link below. Let me ask a quick question. There were a few bugs that I have submitted, as well as feature enhancements. In some cases I submitted updated source code. These are 9083, 9084, 9154, 9325. How might one inquire whether they will be included in the next release

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4565] - Memory Leak in transcode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: simplifying occurrence indicators

We don't have Xerces 1.4.4. Are you using Xerces-J? If so, please direct your question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Alex Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:21 AM Subject: simplifying occurrence indicators > > The SAX d

Re: Pretty printing a DOM tree

We are working on a C++ version, this is in plan. Please see http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/releases_plan.html. Tinny - Original Message - From: "David R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:03 AM Subject: Re: Pretty printing a DOM tree > > I fo

Problem with XMLString :: transcode()

Hi,   I am developing an application for Windows and Solaris using Xerces-C++ parser. I have a problem with deleting the string returned by XMLString :: transcode().   The application runs fine on Solaris but gives memory exception when run on Windows. I read the FAQ and found the answer of