DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14265] - Access violation with Null systemId/publicId in DTDScanner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14479] - XMLString::subString failure when len(source)==0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Xalan-J 1.0.1 Source Code

Not rsync; but the anonymous CVS desscirbed further down on http://httpd.apache.org/dev/anoncvs.txt and with http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-xerces/c/Readme.html you can see what TAGs have been laid down - or a date range. cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/

RE: Xalan-J 1.0.1 Source Code

Thanks for the pointer but it doesn't seem to work. I tried doing rsync but it fails. Moreover, I am not sure whether the source code for xalan 1.0.1 is listed in there. Can anyone who knows how to access xalan 1.0.1-src.zip point me to it .. Thanks. Kaushik. -Original Message- From: Dirk

Re: Xalan-J 1.0.1 Source Code

> Does anyone still have a copy of xalan-java 1.0.1 source code (zip) If you > do, please forward it to me. You should be able to check it out from CVS using anonymous CVS. See dev.apache.org for the procedure. Dw - To unsubsc

Xalan-J 1.0.1 Source Code

Does anyone still have a copy of xalan-java 1.0.1 source code (zip) If you do, please forward it to me. Thanks much. Kaushik Lahoti, Wells Fargo, San Francisco. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14389] - DOMPrint - gDoCreate - wrong default value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14546] - warnings in samples/ for gcc-3.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14087] - in namespace-aware mode, xmlns declarations are to be allowed anywhere, even if the DTD doesn't allow for "equivalent attributes"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14370] - VC6 build has pre-processor WIN64 defined

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14543] - XMLDOMMsg.hpp not copied to include/

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Versioning

I think when we introduced the "so-name" packaging in Xerces-C++ 2.0, it already implied our versioning strategy (which is similar to your URL document) i.e. for Major.Minor.Patch if binary compatible, only Patch number change, "so-name" is the same if source compatible, but binary not, then Minor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14516] - Repetitive node validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: problem with Japanese under Linux Redhat 8.0

Thanks Tinny, I finally went for IconvGNU use as a transcoder, instead of 'native'. ICU is a too heavy change for us now. Maybe the online documentation could be improved on that important topic : . Emphasis is brought on ICU, and very little on iconv . XML4C is said to be licensed as Apache+X,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14544] - CVS Version not 2.2.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14545] - samples/Makefile.incl has bad -L for linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14546] New: - warnings in samples/ for gcc-3.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14545] New: - samples/Makefile.incl has bad -L for linux

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14544] - CVS Version not 2.2.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14544] New: - CVS Version not 2.2.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14543] New: - XMLDOMMsg.hpp not copied to include/

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Binary Distribution - new platform / compiler

"Gareth Reakes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We will happily do this. We are about to sort out nightly builds > of Pathan anyway. Excellent! Thanks Gareth. > The only question I have is what compiler version(s) we > should compile with. I would suggest 2.96 and 3.2 . However, it seems that

Versioning

Hey All, To my knowledge, we haven't really decided on a policy of what version numbers to use for xerces, i.e. when to increment major/minor/patch numbers. I found the following to be enlightening, and offer it to the group for comment: http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html Cheers, jas. ---

Re: Binary Distribution - new platform / compiler

Hi, we will happily do this. We are about to sort out nightly builds of Pathan anyway. The only question I have is what compiler version(s) we should compile with. I would suggest 2.96 and 3.2 . However, it seems that the current build is 3.1 . Does anyone require this? I will provide th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14516] - Repetitive node validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu