Schema problem

2002-12-02 Thread Bagepalli, Kiran
If I have a local declaration with no type(either a simple or complex type), I get no error from TraverseSchema.     Is this not illegal?   Thanks Kiran   - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14528] - reported by Burkhardt Martin

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14528] - reported by Burkhardt Martin

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Wrapper4InputSource does not work since get/set Encoding are not virtual on InputSource!

2002-12-02 Thread Urs Muff
Title: Wrapper4InputSource does not work since get/set Encoding are not virtual on InputSource! /*  * $Id: Wrapper4InputSource.hpp,v 1.5 2002/11/04 15:00:21 tng Exp $  */ Implementing those functions in Wrapper4InputSource does not really help, since InputSource does not declare them virtua

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

2002-12-02 Thread Duncan_Stodart
Sorry have not had time to look into canonical formatting.  My current opinion is that it would be OK for format-pretty-print to potentially make a document invalid (with Xerces specific words in the API doco), and leave it for the canonical-form feature to worry about maintaining validity with th

The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-02 Thread Ted Leung
Hello all,   At ApacheCon I had a number of great discussions with people from all over the ASF.  One of the many topics of discussion was around the organization of the ASF.  I'm going to try to summarize the organization discussion below.   It seems that there are 2 major issues:   1. The

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12490] - patches required to build Xerces-C++ on BeOS R5

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13801] - cygwin libxerces-c.dll symlinks misleading

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13804] - update build and installation docs for cygwin

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14998] - Cleaning the GrammarRegistry on reusing the grammar

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14723] - Memory leak in atomicOpsMutex

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DOM faster than SAX ?

2002-12-02 Thread Jeffrey Rodriguez
Hi, Could you please give some details on the measurements that you took, document size, observation about type of documents, etc. What about validation vs. no validation, namespace vs. no-namespace, Schema validation on? etc. Just want to make sure that I understand your comparison. You obse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13804] - update build and installation docs for cygwin

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13801] - cygwin libxerces-c.dll symlinks misleading

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DOM faster than SAX ?

2002-12-02 Thread Erik Rydgren
I did the same test as you. Parsed a XML file (size ~5k) with DTD validation and reuse grammar 1000 times with DOM and 1000 times with SAX and an Empty Document handler. I made sure to load up the grammar before doing the benchmark so the grammar build time is not in the results. And my result is t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14998] New: - Cleaning the GrammarRegistry on reusing the grammar

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14996] - Unproper condition ?

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14996] - Unproper condition ?

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14996] New: - Unproper condition ?

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

2002-12-02 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi all, I don't want this thread to disappear into oblivion again so this is the last chance to speak up. Duncun, have you or do you intend to query the DOM WG on the issues you raised? Gareth -- Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192 DecisionSoft Limited

DOM faster than SAX ?

2002-12-02 Thread Nikko
Hi, I've made some measurements, comparing a SAX parsing time to the time needed to build a DOM tree, with the same pinput xml. All that without File I/O time.    Results are quite surprising : DOM seems to be 2* faster than SAX. I was wondering if this could be due to the string conversion

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12188] - Wrong datatype hierarchy

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12188] - Wrong datatype hierarchy

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: MalformedURLException with BCB6

2002-12-02 Thread vincent_finn
> Xerces used this exception internally, but your IDE settings force BCB > to stop execution (for BCB5: Tools -> Debugger Options... -> Language > Exceptions). I thought it'd be something simple :-) Thanks, Vin - To unsubscribe,

Re: MalformedURLException with BCB6

2002-12-02 Thread Vitaly Prapirny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vitaly Prapirny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > but if I try and run DOMPrint as it stands I get a > > 'MalformedURLException' > > > when it attempt to parse the sample file > > > > Are you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14960] - Request to open interface

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12188] - Wrong datatype hierarchy

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12188] - Wrong datatype hierarchy

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14960] - Request to open interface

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12188] - Wrong datatype hierarchy

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12238] - Wrong datatype for attribute w/o type declaration

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: MalformedURLException with BCB6

2002-12-02 Thread vincent_finn
> -Original Message- > From: Vitaly Prapirny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > but if I try and run DOMPrint as it stands I get a > 'MalformedURLException' > > when it attempt to parse the sample file > > Are you run it from command line ? > No I was ru

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12238] - Wrong datatype for attribute w/o type declaration

2002-12-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: MalformedURLException with BCB6

2002-12-02 Thread Vitaly Prapirny
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a problem with xercesc using Borland C++ Builder 6 (Personal), on NT4 > I have recently started using BCB and tried to use xerces and couldn't > > I can build the dll and lib but DOMPrint crashes as does my own code > I have been using the parser f

RE: document's encoding

2002-12-02 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi, I have never used the function. sorry, Gareth On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-2] Petr Jùza wrote: > Hi, > I looked at getActualEncoding() function and I'm not sure about it. I use > XMLSpy 4.0 for editing XML documents and for coding documents. When I use > XML document encoded wi

RE: document's encoding

2002-12-02 Thread Petr Jůza
Hi, I looked at getActualEncoding() function and I'm not sure about it. I use XMLSpy 4.0 for editing XML documents and for coding documents. When I use XML document encoded with "ISO-8859-1" (Xerces could support this encoding directly), getActualEncoding() function returns "UTF-8". Good results I