DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8741] - Support for garbage collection in IDOM implementation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20325] - NoDefTranscoderException not valid

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

new macros for .h/ no .h

Hi all, we now have macros so we can tell when to include xxx.h or not and whether to use std:: or not. I have updated CSetDefs.hpp GCCDefs.hpp SunCCDefs.hpp VCPPDefs.hpp. I believe these are correct from input from the community but please check to see if they work for you. I you want

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20325] New: - NoDefTranscoderException not valid

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20293] - Xerces C 2.3.0: calling domcount from Vim doesn't work anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20293] - Xerces C 2.3.0: calling domcount from Vim doesn't work anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20293] - Xerces C 2.3.0: calling domcount from Vim doesn't work anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20293] - Xerces C 2.3.0: calling domcount from Vim doesn't work anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Trying to catch xml entities

I'm trying to catch xml entities while using the sax2 parser. I'm overriding the startEntity (const XMLCh *const name) method in the DefaultContentHandler class. For some reason this doesn't seem to be called, even though it evidently is doing entity transcoding. Is there a flag I need to set for t

RE: Problem with user data handler, I think

Thanks! I did search bugzilla, but obviously not well enough! :( Thanks for the help, and the hint! Marc Robertson Staff Consultant AWD Development DST Systems, Inc.

RE: Problem with user data handler, I think

on my todo list :) Gareth On Wed, 28 May 2003, Nathan Codding wrote: > Hi. > > It seems likely that you're running into the bug where UserDataHandlers are not > called on non-leaf nodes in the tree: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16817 > > There's a patch attached to th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16817] - Non-leaf-node UserDataHandlers not notified of NODE_DELETED (w/patch)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Problem with user data handler, I think

Hi. It seems likely that you're running into the bug where UserDataHandlers are not called on non-leaf nodes in the tree: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16817 There's a patch attached to that bug (hint, hint). :) -Nathan Codding PureEdge Solutions, Inc -Original Message-

Problem with user data handler, I think

Hi All! I'm having a problem with my DOMUserDataHandler derived class. At times when a DOMElement gets deleted, the handle method of my class doesn't get called. At least thats what seems to be happening! First, a bit of background. We've decided to wrap Xerces in a couple of classes of our

Re: [ANN]: Xerces-C 2.3.0 released!

> "Neil" == Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Neil> Hi Colin, Sorry about that; for some reason I had been under Neil> the misapprehension that the createDocs scripts took care of Neil> this. I've now updated the website; can you let me know if Neil> it worked? Yes. The

RE: [ANN]: Xerces-C 2.3.0 released!

5% degradation is much less frightening than 45%. I'm glad that the sky is sagging, rather than falling, and that Khaled will be looking for ways to prop it up. ;) Thanks for clarifying. > -Original Message- > From: Neil Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1

RE: [ANN]: Xerces-C 2.3.0 released!

Hi Jesse, I don't know about "studies", but we've done a number of performance measurements that are at least somewhat more comprehensive than one run of DOMCount on one particular box. So far something like 5% looks to be about what we're seeing in terms of an overall degradation. Not ideal, n

Re: [ANN]: Xerces-C 2.3.0 released!

Hi Colin, Sorry about that; for some reason I had been under the misapprehension that the createDocs scripts took care of this. I've now updated the website; can you let me know if it worked? Thanks, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 E-mai