RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Doh! This is what happens on Fridays :-) Thanks. -Original Message- From: Dave Connet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 >Can you point m

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 We have been using MS parser in lot of our products in the past. It has created more headache for us. A lot of it has to do with backward compatibility. Every new release end up creating problems for applications using older version. Sometime they

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Dave Connet
>Can you point me to some tarbal tools? Winzip I just tried downloading one of the cvs files, and ran into the same problem. Turns out that saving the file (as least in IE), saves the file as "xml-xerces_20030619224319.tar.tar". Opening this gives that nasty error that Naveen mentioned. Just chan

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Neil Graham
Hi Naveen, I use the Cygwin tools myself, available from http://www.cygwin.com. They provide pretty much everything a Linux lover like myself could want. Of course, if you're not so enamoured of Linux/Unix, this might not be for you. :) Cheers, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toront

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread David Schulze
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Can I ask why you are moving away from the MSXML parser? I was thinking of using that instead of Xerces in the future.  Perhaps you have some reasons I should reconsider?   Thanks David Schulze DeLorme Mapping Yarmouth, ME, USA -Original Me

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 It would be great that if I can get to use new version of Xerces. I am starting a huge project next Monday and I would definitely like to use new parser if I can. We are tryingto move away from MS XML Parser. I have been very happy with Xerces 2.2 s

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Neil Graham
Hi Naveen, Sounds like you need to download some tools to handle tarballs. :) Anyway, next week I'll try and upload some new binaries into our nightly directories; it's been a while since the last release and some bugs--particularly with respect to MSVC 7.1--have been fixed. Cheers, Neil Neil G

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 I tried all 4 build and none of them could be opened. All throw error "Error reading header after processing 0 entries". May be its not my luck to use new version of Xercess. I think i will go back to using older version. Thanks. -Original

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread david_n_bertoni
You can get nightly tarballs from here, if you don't want to set up CVS on your machine: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/xml-xerces/ By the way, can you please set your newsreader to send plain text instead of HTML? Dave |-+---> | | "Ko

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Here is million dollar question... How do I get the newest source for Xercess2.3 from CVS? The reason I am asking is because I don't know how to use the CVS system. Is there is a simple way to get it. I tried to patch couple of files. But does not

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Thanks. I will do the same -Original Message- From: Alberto Massari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12.05 20/06/2003 -0400, Kohli, Naveen wrote: >Pardon my ignorance in this mat

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Alberto Massari
At 12.05 20/06/2003 -0400, Kohli, Naveen wrote: Pardon my ignorance in this matter... Do I need to get this file only or should I get the whole tree. It's better if you get the whole tree; I had to patch several files to make VC++ 7.1 compile Xerces 2.3 Alberto --

RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Pardon my ignorance in this matter... Do I need to get this file only or should I get the whole tree. Thanks, Naveen K Kohli -Original Message- From: Alberto Massari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:01 PM To: [E

Re: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Alberto Massari
At 11.58 20/06/2003 -0400, Kohli, Naveen wrote: I am trying to compile Xerces 2.3 on Visual Studio 7.1. I am not getting anywhere because of whole bunch of compile errors. Is there something special that I need to do to compile the source. [..] You need to get the latest CVS sources. Alberto

Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Kohli, Naveen
I am trying to compile Xerces 2.3 on Visual Studio 7.1. I am  not getting anywhere because of whole bunch of compile errors. Is there something special that I need to do to compile the source.   Thanks.   ..\..\..\..\..\src\xercesc\validators\common\CMLeaf.hpp(143) : error C2226: syntax

Setting path to bin

2003-06-20 Thread elliot . rapp
I am distributing the Xerces dll with my application (or I will be at some point). Is there any reason to add the path to the folder that the dll will reside in? Just looking for an informed decision to double-check and cover my bases. Thanks. -