DOMNodeList memory allocation?

2003-07-03 Thread jiang lei
Hi everybody, Everytime I use the method DOMNode::getElementsByTagname() I am quite worried about the memory allocation. That method returns a pointer to DOMNodeList, which stores node pointers in a temporary place. So it came to me like there are possibly 2 pattern for the mak

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21328] New: - MemBufInputSource "adoptBuffer" set to true results in assertion failure

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21275] - Can't open file in root directory.

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Gareth Reakes
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Paramdeep Ahuja wrote: > then is there any way a subtree can be validated?? Take a look at the way the code works in Pathan and see if it does what you want. The file to start looking at is src/context/DocumentCacheImpl.cpp Gareth > > > -Original Message- > Fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21275] - Can't open file in root directory.

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Paramdeep Ahuja
then is there any way a subtree can be validated?? -Original Message- From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Subtree validation Hi, On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Paramdeep Ahuja wrote: > As far

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Erik Rydgren
No the DOM core level 3 is still working draft. W3C is doing a last call until the 31st of july. I know that some of the DOM3 functionality is implemented (read/write of DOMTree) and some of it is in the works. I think that Gareth has begun looking at the functionality you want. But don't hold your

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi, On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Paramdeep Ahuja wrote: > As far as i know the DOM core level 3 is released and being usedis there Not really released. Is not candidate recommendation yet. Xerces-C has some support but not full. > any support for this in Xerces C++ to validate a subtree no clear

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Paramdeep Ahuja
As far as i know the DOM core level 3 is released and being usedis there any support for this in Xerces C++ to validate a subtree -Original Message- From: Erik Rydgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Subtree validation

RE: Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Erik Rydgren
The sad answer is: you can't. Validation of a DOM tree is DOM core level 3 which is still in working draft. It is definitely planed to be implemented. But when? I don't know. Regards Erik Rydgren Mandarin IT Sweden > -Original Message- > From: Paramdeep Ahuja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Subtree validation

2003-07-03 Thread Paramdeep Ahuja
Hi All Can anyone tell me how can I validate a subtree against a schema using Xerces C++ *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21306] New: - ifeq test too restrictive in util/Compilers/Makefile

2003-07-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu