Hi David,
I would like to build this on the AS/400 (iSeries), too. Can you tell me the
settings for AS/400? I've loaded gmake so I think I just need the exports.
Thanks,
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: David Cargill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:14 AM
To:
Anybody has sucess story about building xerces on
solaris machine with gcc?
I got the following error messages when building
examples. Help me, please.
Thanks
-chunlin
Building SAXPrintgmake -C SAXPrint
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/tools/xerces-c-src_2_5_0/samples/SAXPrint'mkdir -p
I appreciate the feedbacks on this subject, they have been very helpful.
I quantified my application and I'd like to report the results that I have obtained.
I compared xercesc.2.1.0 with xercesc.2.5.0. built with STLport.4.5.3. libhoard was
taken out since it would not work with quantify. The
Thank you David.
Let me cover a more basic question. For z/OS, am I suppose to download the
tar file from the website and use pax to load it onto HFS or is there
another route to get the xerces tree onto HFS. The pax route generated a
few error messages.
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
Hi Wenning,
I have seen similar performance degradation (though, not because of
xerces upgrade) in past. It turned out that some of the components I was
using were using their own malloc/new implementation and hoard could not
override the malloc/new calls that were made through those compon
Thanks for the info David.
I will tuck this away in a safe place for future refference.
-Original Message-
From: David Cargill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: z/OS and OS/390 runConfigure ???
Hi,
To build xerc
"Bovy, Stephen J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then why haven't those fixes been merged back into the Xerces tree ???
You are assuming there are fixes. It may just be that there are tweaks
needed to new code which has appeared since the last time they did a port.
That typically happens with ports
Yes I am using a Solaris box with 4 processors.
-Original Message-
From: Karande Samir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 12:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Performance degradation
Hi Wenning,
Do you use multiprocessor (SMP) systems ? I am assumi
Hi,
To build xerces-c on 390 we just use "configure" rather than using the
runConfigure wrapper script so that is why the runConfigure script hasn't
been modified. I will see what we can do about getting runConfigure
modified for 390 for the next release...
The environment variables I set (th
Hi Wenning,
Do you use multiprocessor (SMP) systems ? I am assuming SMP system
because you are using hoard.
-Samir
-Original Message-
From: Qiu, Wenning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Performance degradation
Hi N
Title: z/OS and OS/390 runConfigure ???
Then why haven't those fixes been merged back into the
Xerces tree ???
Is IBM not being a good citizen in this matter
???
Is IBM Purposefully and intentionally maintaining a
"separate" "fork" of Xerces ?
The main reason I ask this , is because
Title: z/OS and OS/390 runConfigure ???
The general question is: can xerces be compiled and successfully built and function
correctly? IBM XML Toolkit support has indicated that the xerces code would need updates
for it to function (ie that IBM XML Toolkit support does).
Content-Ty
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1203
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Anybody can help me to solve this problem? Thank
you very much.
Rgds
-chunlin
The steps I used.
1, ./src/xercesc/autoconf
2, ./src/xercesc/runConfigure -psolaris -cgcc -xg++ -minmem -nsocket
-tnative -rpthread
3, gmake
I didn't get any error.
Then I go to ./samples
1, ./runConfigu
14 matches
Mail list logo