Has anyone compiled xerces-c with the latest version of g++?
I think this snippet from the release notes is going to cause grief:
# In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members of a
dependent base. For example,
template struct B {
int m;
in
Hi Andy and all,
I've now rolled some of the points that we seem to have consensus on into
the original charter I suggested back at the beginning of April. I've
posted it on the Wiki page [*] where Berin had kindly placed his reworking
of that document.
I'm also attaching a diff of my origi
Message:
The following issue has been resolved as FIXED.
Resolver: Neil Graham
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 8:51 AM
Thanks for the report and the patch Dave. It's now in CVS.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.or
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Neil Graham (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1218
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Neil Graham (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1216
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
--- Alberto Massari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: >
At 14.45 21/05/2004 +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] Andreas
> Karlsson
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I use the same DOMBuilder object for
> parsing
> > > > several XML files, thus buildi
At 14.45 21/05/2004 +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] Andreas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> > When I use the same DOMBuilder object for parsing
> > several XML files, thus building several DOM trees
> for
> > the same parser, the latter document gets an
> illegal
> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] Andreas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> > When I use the same DOMBuilder object for parsing
> > several XML files, thus building several DOM trees
> for
> > the same parser, the latter document gets an
> illegal
> > pointer and there is no way of accessing the
Hi,
On Fri, 21 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> When I use the same DOMBuilder object for parsing
> several XML files, thus building several DOM trees for
> the same parser, the latter document gets an illegal
> pointer and there is no way of accessing the
> DOMDocument. Could th
When I use the same DOMBuilder object for parsing
several XML files, thus building several DOM trees for
the same parser, the latter document gets an illegal
pointer and there is no way of accessing the
DOMDocument. Could this be happening due to an old
version of Xerces (2.1.0.)?
Further more; i
Or tell me how to do it.
--- Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> pathans are yes. My understanding is that most of
> the IBM schema
> suite are from open schema conformance suites from
> people like the w3c.
> IFRC there are a fair number of tests in xerces-p.
> There was some
Yes, There are a project to merge Xerces to our
product. I'll take in charge of software testing.
Perhaps I can do some jobs for Xerces-C.
If possible, please give me more detailed info.thank
you.
william
--- Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> pathans are yes. My understand
Hi,
pathans are yes. My understanding is that most of the IBM schema
suite are from open schema conformance suites from people like the w3c.
IFRC there are a fair number of tests in xerces-p. There was some talk a
while ago about bringing them in. We all said it was a good idea and then
did
Are those test source files open source?
--- Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> there are other tests that are run which are not in
> the source
> tree. For example, IBM have a large suite of schema
> tests. Pathan also has
> a large suite of tests which get run frequently
>
Hi,
there are other tests that are run which are not in the source
tree. For example, IBM have a large suite of schema tests. Pathan also has
a large suite of tests which get run frequently against CVS and also
before release.
Gareth
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Cai Wenliang wrote:
>
> Thanks,
Thanks, Alberto
Just sanity test?
Willaim
--- Alberto Massari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02.08 21/05/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Hi, folks
> >
> >Who can tell me how the Xerces dev team do software
> >testing? Where is the testcases? Who manage it? I
> >think testing is important for ever
At 02.08 21/05/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Hi, folks
Who can tell me how the Xerces dev team do software
testing? Where is the testcases? Who manage it? I
think testing is important for every software project,
including open source project.
There is a sanity test suite started by the script/runSanTest.s
Hi, folks
Who can tell me how the Xerces dev team do software
testing? Where is the testcases? Who manage it? I
think testing is important for every software project,
including open source project.
I am forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot.
William
=
Regards,
Cai Wenliang
18 matches
Mail list logo
