[jira] Created: (XERCESC-1235) Xerces-C++ does not build with gcc 3.4.0

2004-06-28 Thread xerces-c-dev
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1235 Here is an overview of the issue: -

Static Compile under Mandrake 10

2004-06-28 Thread Dave Jarvis
Hello, I've installed what I think are all the static libraries used by Xerces C++, however I cannot create a static compile for Xerces, and could not find the switches documented either online or within the configuration and Makefile.incl files. Note that I've disabled multithreading for now.

Re: XMLException default constructor is dangerous

2004-06-28 Thread David Cargill
I have made the change you suggested. The other XMLException constructor (that takes arguments) tested if the memory manager was null and set it to the default. Regards, David A. Cargill XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab (905) 413-2371, tie 969 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Alberto Massari
Hi Chris, At 13.32 28/06/2004 -0400, Styduhar, Chris wrote: I apologize for the mistake in the URL - please use the second one :) I should have looked harder to that URL ;-) Anyhow, I tried using "DOMPrint -n -s" on a dummy XML pointing to that URL, and it worked (that is, I got a bunch of validat

XMLException default constructor is dangerous

2004-06-28 Thread Jesse Pelton
I've just upgraded an application that used Xerces 2.0 to 2.5. Our SAX parser derives its own exception class from XMLException. The default XMLException constructor sets the memory manager to NULL, and the XMLException destructor assumes it's not NULL and blindly calls fMemoryManager->deallocate

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Styduhar, Chris
I apologize for the mistake in the URL - please use the second one :) -Original Message- From: Jesse Pelton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server Depends on

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Styduhar, Chris
I only typed (2) w's in the first instance of the name. Please use: http://www.stydie.com/xml/qd_request.xsd I am working on putting the XML files up there too. -Original Message- From: Adam Heinz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Jesse Pelton
Depends on which URL you use. The first one in the original message had "ww." instead of "www." -Original Message- From: Styduhar, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Adam Heinz
I'm having no trouble viewing it either. Adam Heinz Senior Software Developer Exstream Software -Original Message- From: Styduhar, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a c

RE: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Styduhar, Chris
http://www.stydie.com/xml/qd_request.xsd I was just able to hit that address from my computer... -Original Message- From: Alberto Massari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Quick problem validating against schema located on a

Re: Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Alberto Massari
Hi Chris, I tried connecting to the address you provided, but I get an "unknown host" error message. Are you sure you wrote the URL correctly? Alberto At 13.12 28/06/2004 -0400, Styduhar, Chris wrote: We are trying to validate an XML file against a schema that is located on our web server (

[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1231) DOMParser::parse() returns error for XML file with Chinese name

2004-06-28 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Alberto Massari Created: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:18 AM Body: Hi Prasanna, version 1.5.1 is very old, so the code base is very different from now (C++ namespaces, pluggable memory manager, and so on). But you can try looking a

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1231) DOMParser::parse() returns error for XML file with Chinese name

2004-06-28 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Alberto Massari (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:07 AM Comment: Hi Alberto, We r using Xerces-c 1.5.1 and since it is tightly coupled with our system , it is not possible for us to change the version . Can u tell me

How can I determine if a version later than XML C++ 1.6 might sup port ISO 8859-15 encoding ??

2004-06-28 Thread Hahn Anthony
Folks, Our organization is trying to settle on an encoding and -15 looks like the prime candidate right now ( I'm not involved in making the decision ). Version 1.6 does not seem to be happy with the attempt to set -15 as the encoding. If there is a later version, we would be interested in mov

Quick problem validating against schema located on a central web server

2004-06-28 Thread Styduhar, Chris
We are trying to validate an XML file against a schema that is located on our web server (http://ww.stydie.com/xml/qd_request.xsd).  When we run the parse function (DOM parser), we get the following error:   “Message: An exception occurred! Type:NetAccessorException, Message: Could not co

Samples Don't Compile with G++

2004-06-28 Thread Dave Jarvis
Hi, I know that the documentation says if you use G++ you are on your own, however after revisiting C++ (from a 6 year hiatus), I was hoping to find some examples the compiled out of the box, when I slapped them into a new file. Some examples are missing a namespace declaration (which I had to

Re: ML moderation

2004-06-28 Thread Jason E. Stewart
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > >> for quite some time we have only had one ML moderator, Dirk the ASF >> president. Well, none of the mails were getting moderated and they > > Aye - as I've been traveling a lot; and generally only