xerces-c compilation error on fedora core 3 test 1, gcc 3.4.1

2004-08-26 Thread zx wu
I have just downloaded xerces-x-2.5.0 and trying to compile the software using gcc 3.4.1 on fedora core 3 test 1. However, there are errors in the compilation as shown in the compilation message In file included from /home/mzxwu/usr/local/src/xerces-c-src_2_5_0/include/xercesc/util/RefArrayOf.hp

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:53 AM Comment: Xerces.hpp goes in include, NOT in xercesc. Changes: Attachment changed to Xerces.hpp ---

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:52 AM Comment: Framework.hpp goes in xercesc/framework. This header compiles, but is unfinished. Changes: Attachment changed to Framework.hpp -

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:35 AM Comment: Util.hpp goes in xercesc/util. This header compiles, but is unfinished. Changes: Attachment changed to Util.hpp

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:06 AM Comment: SAX2.hpp goes in xercesc/sax2. Changes: Attachment changed to SAX2.hpp --

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 7:55 AM Comment: Internal.hpp goes in xercesc/internal. Changes: Attachment changed to Internal.hpp --

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 7:19 AM Comment: Parsers.hpp goes in xercesc/parsers. Changes: Attachment changed to Parsers.hpp -

[jira] Updated: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 6:56 AM Comment: SAX.hpp goes in xercesc/sax. Changes: Attachment changed to SAX.hpp -

[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Adam Heinz Created: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 6:48 AM Body: I meant to put this in as a blocker, but I don't appear to have the privileges to change the bug type post-creation. -

[jira] Created: (XERCESC-1266) need framework headers for Mach-O

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1266 Here is an overview of the issue: -

Re: Xerces-C 2.6 Release

2004-08-26 Thread Gareth Reakes
All good for me. Gareth David Cargill wrote: In a note to this list in April regarding the Xerces-C 2.6 Features List, I suggested releasing Xerces-C 2.6 in 4Q 2004. As most of the features are complete I propose September 29th for the actual release date. I would also like to propose changing so

Re: AS/400 problem Was Re: Xerces-C 2.6 Release

2004-08-26 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hey, is there a bug created for this? If not, its a good idea to do so. These things have a habit of getting lost... Gareth Patrick Townsend wrote: Hi David, I reported a problem with building Xerces on the iSeries (AS/400) platform a few weeks ago. The configuration scripts were reporting

Re: Can Xerces-C++ create an XML skeleton based on a Schema?

2004-08-26 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi, no is the short answer. The problem is actually quite difficult. For example, do you go for a minimal or maximal instance? If you have a specific requirement this is definitely possible to code via the Schema Grammar. If you need more info give me a shout. Gareth 刘 颖 wrote: > Than

[jira] Assigned: (XERCESC-1264) replace user "includes" in public headers with system

2004-08-26 Thread xerces-c-dev
Message: The following issue has been re-assigned. Assignee: Gareth Reakes (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1264 Here is an overview of the issue:

Re: Best way to custom serialize a DOMElement node?

2004-08-26 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hey, Adam Heinz wrote: Why do you have to copy the code from the impl class? DOMWriter seems to consist entirely of virtual functions, so you should be able to override writeNode() and handle your user data or call the inherited DOMWriter::writeNode(). Unfortunately, I think you will have to als