I have just downloaded xerces-x-2.5.0 and trying to compile the software
using gcc 3.4.1 on fedora core 3 test 1. However, there are errors in the
compilation as shown in the compilation message
In file included from
/home/mzxwu/usr/local/src/xerces-c-src_2_5_0/include/xercesc/util/RefArrayOf.hp
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:53 AM
Comment:
Xerces.hpp goes in include, NOT in xercesc.
Changes:
Attachment changed to Xerces.hpp
---
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:52 AM
Comment:
Framework.hpp goes in xercesc/framework. This header compiles, but is unfinished.
Changes:
Attachment changed to Framework.hpp
-
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:35 AM
Comment:
Util.hpp goes in xercesc/util. This header compiles, but is unfinished.
Changes:
Attachment changed to Util.hpp
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 8:06 AM
Comment:
SAX2.hpp goes in xercesc/sax2.
Changes:
Attachment changed to SAX2.hpp
--
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 7:55 AM
Comment:
Internal.hpp goes in xercesc/internal.
Changes:
Attachment changed to Internal.hpp
--
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 7:19 AM
Comment:
Parsers.hpp goes in xercesc/parsers.
Changes:
Attachment changed to Parsers.hpp
-
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Adam Heinz (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 6:56 AM
Comment:
SAX.hpp goes in xercesc/sax.
Changes:
Attachment changed to SAX.hpp
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Adam Heinz
Created: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 6:48 AM
Body:
I meant to put this in as a blocker, but I don't appear to have the privileges to
change the bug type post-creation.
-
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1266
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
All good for me.
Gareth
David Cargill wrote:
In a note to this list in April regarding the Xerces-C 2.6 Features List, I
suggested releasing Xerces-C 2.6 in 4Q 2004. As most of the features are
complete I propose September 29th for the actual release date.
I would also like to propose changing so
Hey,
is there a bug created for this? If not, its a good idea to do so.
These things have a habit of getting lost...
Gareth
Patrick Townsend wrote:
Hi David,
I reported a problem with building Xerces on the iSeries (AS/400) platform a
few weeks ago. The configuration scripts were reporting
Hi,
no is the short answer. The problem is actually quite difficult. For
example, do you go for a minimal or maximal instance? If you have a
specific requirement this is definitely possible to code via the Schema
Grammar. If you need more info give me a shout.
Gareth
刘 颖 wrote:
> Than
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Gareth Reakes (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1264
Here is an overview of the issue:
Hey,
Adam Heinz wrote:
Why do you have to copy the code from the impl class? DOMWriter seems to consist entirely of virtual functions, so you should be able to override writeNode() and handle your user data or call the inherited DOMWriter::writeNode().
Unfortunately, I think you will have to als
15 matches
Mail list logo