I've been running into problems with the way data type validation of
base64Binary is done forever, but this is hitting critical now. ;-(
If I'm understanding correctly, the 2.6.0 changes now require that datatype
normalization be on (I note the default is off) in order to get very typical
base64 c
> But the reason for doing this is eloquently expressed
> in this very thread--people were confused by this
> library's presence, and some thought they needed it
> around to use the parser.
Are you sure that's what's being expressed? Because that's not how I read
it. I read it as "the distribut
> This was done intentionally. On no other platform were both debug and
> release binaries both issued, so it wasn't clear why this was being done
> on Windows. No functionality is lost.
As David just noted, this is a problem for at least some of us. Is there any
chance of reposting the zip fi
Hi Dave,
But the reason for doing this is eloquently expressed in this very
thread--people were confused by this library's presence, and some thought
they needed it around to use the parser.
The expression "you're damned if you do, you're damned if you don't" comes
to mind here. :) Fortunate
> This was done intentionally. On no other platform
> were both debug and release binaries both issued,
> so it wasn't clear why this was being done on Windows.
> No functionality is lost.
Actually, functionality is lost, because you can no longer build debug
executables for your applications th
Hi Carolina,
This was done intentionally. On no other platform were both debug and
release binaries both issued, so it wasn't clear why this was being done
on Windows. No functionality is lost.
Cheers!
Neil
Neil Graham
Manager, XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Scott Cantor
Created: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:31 PM
Body:
This is still broken in 2.6.0. Double ugh.
-
View this comment:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Message:
The following issue has been resolved as INVALID.
Resolver: cargilld
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 9:41 AM
Marking invalid as per previous comment from Dallas.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
Message:
The following issue has been resolved as INVALID.
Resolver: cargilld
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 9:35 AM
Closing this issue as it works in the latest code. We don't supply fixes for earlier
releases, although a comment has been added to this issue that may resolve the problem.
Message:
The following issue has been resolved as FIXED.
Resolver: cargilld
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 9:32 AM
Updating resolution to fixed, as Khaled checked in a change a while ago.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.a
Message:
The following issue has been resolved as FIXED.
Resolver: cargilld
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 9:06 AM
Updating resolution to fixed, as Khaled checked in a change a while ago.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.a
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1286
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
12 matches
Mail list logo