Hi,
I had some working code that I was running with xerces 2.5 and when I changed to
xerces 2.6, it broke. Did something related to DOMTypeInfo change? Here's the
code snippet:
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < paramNodes->getLength(); i++) {
DOMNode * paramItem = paramNodes->item(i);
Hi,
Discussions with my
colleagues has raised a wish-list item. It would be nice to have a "nested
comment" feature allowing the commenting of large portions of XML, which itself
may contain comments. Currently, any attempt to do so results in
failure at the point the first internal comm
> Discussions with my colleagues has raised a wish-list item. It would be
nice to have a "nested comment" feature
> allowing the commenting of large portions of XML, which itself may
contain comments.
You want something you think is "nice," but has a very high cost.
Something that would requir
Hi,
Could you provide us with a small snippet of xml and the code you use
to parse the document?
Cheers,
Gareth
Steve Harrington wrote:
Hi,
I had some working code that I was running with xerces 2.5 and when I
changed to xerces 2.6, it broke. Did something related to DOMTypeInfo
change? Here's
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-684?page=history ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-684:
--
Assign To: (was: Xerces-C Developers Mailing List)
Resolution: Fixed
A fix is in CVS. Please verify.
> Add accessor to XMLScanner to get the cu
Xerces implements standards. If you can get the W3C XML
committee to incorporate this into the standard, I'm sure Xerces will support
it. However, the fact that it's not already there suggests that it might not, in
fact, be "welcome by all."
From: Gill, Prabhprit (Prabh)
[mailto:[
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1303?page=history ]
Alberto Massari closed XERCESC-1303:
> NodeIterator and TreeWalker ExpandEntityReferences not implemented
> --
>
>
