Got it, thanks :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2005å1æ5æ 15:36
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is valid for Xerces parser?
> Hi,
>
> I have an xml document:
>
> fdfds
>
>
> And I use XercesDOMParser to parser this document
> Hi,
>
> I have an xml document:
>
> fdfds
>
>
> And I use XercesDOMParser to parser this documentation. In my thought,
it should be invalid
> for the root tag is not the exactly same, but I got the right dom tree.
After I write this dom tree back,
> it changed to:
>
> fdfds
>
> Is it the
Hi,
I have an xml
document:
fdfds
And I use
XercesDOMParser to parser this documentation. In my thought, it should be
invalid for the root tag is not the exactly same, but I got the right dom tree.
After I write this dom tree back, it changed to:
fdfds
Is it the right behavior of Xe
Hi,
I would like to be pushy about some annoying issues that have gotten
notably worse since v2.1 regarding the coding styles, conventions, and
practices, used in Xerces-C development.
I would like to request that developers of Xerces-C cease using
ALL_CAPS_NAMES for anything other than for prepr
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1320?page=history ]
James Berry resolved XERCESC-1320:
--
Resolution: Fixed
questions have been answered; thanks Robert. Now resolving bug.
> Support ICU Transcoding Service on Mac
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1320?page=comments#action_57268 ]
Robert Buck commented on XERCESC-1320:
--
a) Name and employer
Robert Buck
The MathWorks, Inc.
b) Are you the author of the code being conributed?
Yes
c) Do you ha
Just added it. Please take a look to make sure it is what you want.
Thanks,
>-Original Message-
>From: James Berry (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:27 PM
>To: Robert Buck
>Subject: [jira] Reopened: (XERCESC-1320) Support ICU
>Transcoding Service on Mac
I'm trying to develop a schema for an existing XML usage (for which no
schema or DTD was ever written before). I've run into a case that I
can't get Xerces-C to validate, and am not sure whether my schema
construction or the parser validation is the problem. I've put together
a simplified version
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1315?page=comments#action_57263 ]
jerome commented on XERCESC-1315:
-
thanks a lot for your help..
i modify my program.
bye.
> core in xerces hash
> ---
>
> Key: XERCESC-1315
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1322?page=history ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1322:
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Hi,
This problem was reported and fixed in jira bug xercesc-1287. The fix was made
after 2.6 GA'ed so it isn't in the 2.6 binar
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1315?page=comments#action_57252 ]
Alberto Massari commented on XERCESC-1315:
--
Hi Jerome,
Initialize and Terminate can be invoked multiple times, but they are not
multi-thread safe. If you want to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1315?page=comments#action_57251 ]
jerome commented on XERCESC-1315:
-
Yes, my program do lot a thread.
each thread do a PlatformUtil::Initialize and a PlatformUtil::Terminate.
do you tell me to do one initia
12 matches
Mail list logo