Is the motivation for the design of XMemory documented anywhere?
There appear to be some basic flaws in its design.
In Item 22 of his new book: Exceptional C++ Style, Herb Sutter (the chair of
the C++ standards commitee) gives some useful guidelines for overloading
new:
1) If you provide any cl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1148?page=history ]
Alberto Massari closed XERCESC-1148:
> Proposed changes for forthcoming 2.5.0 release (unixware build)
> ---
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1148?page=comments#action_57587 ]
Vitaly Prapirny commented on XERCESC-1148:
--
Verified
Thanks
> Proposed changes for forthcoming 2.5.0 release (unixware build)
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1172?page=comments#action_57581 ]
Alberto Massari commented on XERCESC-1172:
--
Hi Morten,
util\Compilers\CodeWarriorDefs.hpp defines strnicmp and stricmp only if the
preprocessor symbol __MACH__ is
Hey,
Not at the moment. I would be happy to give direction if you wanted to
attempt this yourself.
Gareth
Matthew Berry wrote:
Hi,
XInclude became a W3C recommendation on 20 December.
Are there any plans to provide this type of functionality in Xerces-C?
With or without a pre-proccessor sta
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1148?page=history ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1148:
--
Assign To: (was: Xerces-C Developers Mailing List)
Resolution: Fixed
Patch is in CVS. Please verify.
Alberto
> Proposed change
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1148?page=history ]
Vitaly Prapirny updated XERCESC-1148:
-
Attachment: xercesc-snapshot-20050112115331-unixware.patch.gz
Patch against current CVS snapshot
(xercesc-snapshot-20050112115331-unixware.patc
Hi,
XInclude became a
W3C recommendation on 20 December.
Are there any plans
to provide this type of functionality in Xerces-C? With or without a
pre-proccessor stage.
Matthew BerryAPT
Ltdhttp://www.apt.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information in this em
