Hi Eric,
On 4 Nov 2004, at 17:05, Erik Rydgren wrote:
Thanks for the reply, but unfortunately I have little saying about how
the European central bank generates files ;-)
I have total control over the schema declarations but none over the
xml data.
Anyhow, shouldn’t the target namespace in ec
declarations into the ecb
namespace?
/ Erik
-Original Message-
From: Khaled Noaman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 4 november 2004 17:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More include Schema in
a Schema problems
Hi
Eric,
You have a
problem in your xml file. The 'Cube
instead:
After I changed the elementFormDefault to 'qualified' the xml file was
valid and domprint accepted it. So I guess there is a bug that selects
the wrong schema definition if the file uses different definitions for
elements with the same name.
/ Erik
> ---
MAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
More include Schema in a Schema problems
I'm having problems getting some xml through the xerces validator. The
file is valid through Altova XmlSpy but not in Xerces for some reason.
The file is downloaded from the European central bank and looks
velope, your XML document will parse fine.
Regards,
Khaled
"Erik Rydgren"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/04/2004 10:57 AM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
More include Schema in a
Schema problems
I'm having problems getting
Hey,
If you prefix cube with an appropriate binding, what happens? I
am wondering about what the spec would say about 1 schema the has
elementFormDefault="qualified"
including 1 that does
elementFormDefault="unqualified"
Also, the first schema does state that elements should be qualified. T
I'm having problems getting some xml through the xerces validator. The
file is valid through Altova XmlSpy but not in Xerces for some reason.
The file is downloaded from the European central bank and looks like
this:
http://www.gesmes.org/xml/2002-08-01";
xmlns="http://www.ecb.int/vocabulary/2002
