Re: configuring xercesc (was: New make output)

2005-04-15 Thread Axel Weiß
Axel Weiß wrote: > I'd like to add another notion related to compililation: why gets all > the platform-specific stuff for *all* platforms compiled (and linked > into the library) when building for a particular platform? Sorry for the noise - of course, this is nonsense...

Re: configuring xercesc (was: New make output)

2005-04-13 Thread Axel Weiß
Am Dienstag, 12. April 2005 05:45 schrieb James Berry: > On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:31 AM, Axel Weiß wrote: > > James, did you already develop a strategy for eliminating > > runConfigure? > > Hi Axel, > > Sorry the for the delay in replying, I've been out of town for a day. > > Yes. I've got prototype a

Re: configuring xercesc (was: New make output)

2005-04-11 Thread James Berry
On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:31 AM, Axel Weiß wrote: James, did you already develop a strategy for eliminating runConfigure? Hi Axel, Sorry the for the delay in replying, I've been out of town for a day. Yes. I've got prototype autoconf infrastructure that eliminates both runConfigure and the need for

configuring xercesc (was: New make output)

2005-04-11 Thread Axel Weiß
Hi Gareth, hi James, Gareth Reakes wrote: > Hi Axel, > > Axel Weiß wrote: > > you mean, you want to get rid of the awkward runConfigure script? > > :) > > Oh yes :) > > > Sure, I'd like to help. It doesn't seem to be too complicated, > > either. Who is currently working on this? Is there any strat

Re: New make output

2005-04-11 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi Axel, Axel Weiß wrote: you mean, you want to get rid of the awkward runConfigure script? :) Oh yes :) Sure, I'd like to help. It doesn't seem to be too complicated, either. Who is currently working on this? Is there any strategy in mind? James is sorting this out. I am sure he would love your

Re: New make output

2005-04-07 Thread Axel Weiß
Gareth Reakes wrote: > Hi Axel, > > We are currently moving over to configure / make / make install > model. We should probably wait until that has finished to see if the > changes would still make sense. Would you like to help out with that? Hi Gareth, you mean, you want to get rid of the

Re: New make output

2005-04-07 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi Axel, We are currently moving over to configure / make / make install model. We should probably wait until that has finished to see if the changes would still make sense. Would you like to help out with that? Cheers, Gareth Axel Weiß wrote: Am Dienstag, 5. April 2005 11:21 schrieb Gareth Rea

Re: New make output

2005-04-05 Thread Axel Weiß
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2005 11:21 schrieb Gareth Reakes: > Hi all, > > I have applied the patch from Axel which makes the make output > *much* nicer. The changes seem standard Hi, I'm thinking about re-structuring and simplifying the Makefiles (e.g. putting all configure-related and *very*

New make output

2005-04-05 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi all, I have applied the patch from Axel which makes the make output *much* nicer. The changes seem standard --- xml-xerces/c/src/xercesc/framework/psvi/Makefile.in 2004-09-08 18:53:11.0 +0200 +++ xml-xerces-modified/c/src/xercesc/framework/psvi/Makefile.in 2005-04-03 13:01:45.623939