led Noaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug in schema parser!
>
>
> Do you have an example?
> The min/maxOccurs is not silently ignored . It's handled where the group
is
> actually ref'd (i.e.
content nodes.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks
Kiran
-Original Message-
From: Khaled Noaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug in schema parser!
Do you have an example?
The min/maxOccurs is not silently
Do you have an example?
The min/maxOccurs is not silently ignored . It's handled where the group is
actually ref'd (i.e. within a choice/sequence/etc.).
Khaled
"Bagepalli, Kiran" wrote:
> I looked up on the 2001 spec and it says that minOccurs and
> maxOccurs is valid on a group ref.
>
> Can so
I looked up on the 2001 spec and it says that minOccurs and
maxOccurs is valid on a group ref.
Can someone on this list even say what part of the schema
standard is supported.
Thanks
Kiran
-Original Message-
From: Bagepalli, Kiran
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 12/18/02 7:02 PM
Subject
