For completeness you should also make a const version of
strServiceProfile.unicodeForm() rather than calling this method each time.
EJP
2) Secondly as suggested by David I created const objects and used them in
my
code
const XStr strServiceProfile("ServiceProfile");
...
for (i=0;
Hello,
As a first step I did the following
1) I moved the definitions at one place at the starting of the program.
Originally I had:
for (i=0; icreateElement(X("ServiceProfile"));
I changed it to look something like this:
DOMElement* ServProElem;
...
for (i=0; icreateElement(X("Serv
Title: RE: XML Generation efficiency
I have this same problem so please let me know or post your results to the list if you find a solution.
-- thx,
Bob Vaughn
Telestream, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002
Hi,
If you REALLY want an efficient and fast way to create an XML document, then
just use:
sprintf(buffer,"",parameters)!!
or
fprintf(fptr,",parameters) to print to a stream.
Sid
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 7 October 2002 6
David Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where can I find these "overloads" of XMLString you speak of? In the
> samples? Is that a new 2.x thing or can it be used in v1.7 ?
They're in XMLString.hpp. From the CVS log, it looks like they _are_ in
1.7.
Dave
---
y, October 07, 2002 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XML Generation efficiency
> Hi,
> My need is to generate XML on the fly and then to store it in a memory
buffer.
> Only restriction is that I would like extremely efficient generation of
XML. I
> followed the example
> Hi,
> My need is to generate XML on the fly and then to store it in a memory
buffer.
> Only restriction is that I would like extremely efficient generation of
XML. I
> followed the example CreateDOMDocument and generated a XML file. For the
XML
> file I need took about 20 seconds for the g
