> As a suggestion for the entire mailing list, why don't we use the "vote
> for this bug" feature of Jira? At least we can have a feeling of
> what the users really think is urgent to fix.
Yep, I certainly did. Of course, I can't vote for my own. ;-)
This is exactly what I was asking, essentiall
As a suggestion for the entire mailing list, why don't we use the "vote for
this bug" feature of Jira? At least we can have a feeling of what the users
really think is urgent to fix.
Alberto
At 15.38 23/09/2004 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> While it's no guarantee, referencing specific bug number
> While it's no guarantee, referencing specific bug numbers that are
> show-stoppers for you will certainly help increase the likelihood of
> them getting fixed. Patches, of course, help even more ;)
I'm sure, but since somebody else already pointed to one and got deafening
silence, I had sort o
On Sep 23, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
While the list is discussing the importance of adhering to standards,
is
there any hope of getting a few simple XML schema bugs fixed before
the next
release (e.g. xml:lang is unusable, anyType doesn't handle arbitrary
ttributes)? Most of them don
Title: XML Schema
Hi
Aliza,
The Name and
UnNamed Groups that appear in content models ( group,choice,sequence and all)
can be used only for reprtesenting the element and not the
attributes.
This is not possible using XML Schema instead
you can use XSL validation(Using Xalan) for finding
Title: XML Schema
Hi
Aliza,
The Name and
UnNamed Groups that appear in content models ( group,choice,sequence and all)
can be used only for reprtesenting the element and not the
attributes.
If that is your
requirement you can use XSl validation(Using Xalan) for finding
it.
Best
Regard
Hi,
this is not possible in XML Schema.
Gareth
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Aliza Nagauker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding XML schema indicators.
>
> I have an element that has attributes, but only one of the attributes can be
> define in each element.
> Can I use the choice
I forgot about using XMLspy for testing because the same reason. It was NOT
pure w3c Schemas.
regards,
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Jeronymo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Martes, 05 de Marzo de 2002 02:04 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XML Schema Validation W3C St
Great. Normally, the parser version is reflected in the library name. So, for the next
release of the parser, the library name will include the version (i.e.
xerces-c_1_6_1.dll for win32).
Khaled
Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Khaled Noaman wrote:
>
> > On windows, I am getting error
I've previously logged this problem, bugzilla #5786, which I belive has been fixed in
the overnight builds (thanks to Khaled).
I'd be interested if this build fixes your problems because as I say it cured the
schema errors, however, I now see unexpected validation errors, bugzilla #5807.
I'm ac
hi sam
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote:
>
> > > I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> > > schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
> >
> > Have you tried the Turbo XML 2.2 from www.extensibility.com?
>
>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Utz wrote:
> can you provide a tie-breaker?
>
> asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would
> suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
Found one (thanks to Radovan Chytracek) - TIBCO's Turbo XML 2.2 accepts
the schema and
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote:
> > I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> > schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
>
> Have you tried the Turbo XML 2.2 from www.extensibility.com?
Thanks for the tip - I'll give it a try. I don't think this goi
Hi,
> I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
Have you tried the Turbo XML 2.2 from www.extensibility.com?
Radovan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Utz wrote:
> can you provide a tie-breaker?
>
> asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would
> suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
schema unde
can you provide a tie-breaker?
asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would
suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
I am participating in another thread on the xerces-j mailing list wrt a
newly established XMLSchema standard that can't be validate
Look at almost any of the samples that ship with the 1.5 distribution. I
think DOMCount does what you want on a single file - it is a straight
forward task to extend this to iterate over a directory.
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: Naren Reddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday,
Hi, David,
You are proposing that an application dissables the use of
schemaLocation/ noNamespaceSchemaLocation attributes and instead uses
user specified schemas.
I am not sure if it is a *perfect* solution. I would think that if a
namespace resolution using user specified schemas fails, you m
This is to convey my interest in having the "xsd:include" feature
implemented in the Xerces C implementation.
Thank you.
M. Pinto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
many Java solutions, and few
C++ options. I suppose it goes to cross-platform issues...
- kaoruAngel
- Original Message -
From: "Arnold, Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: XML Schema-- Does ANY C++
Definitely the Xerces-C implementation of schema is underway. Currently, The Oracle
XML Parser for C++ supports an previous working draft of XML schema, check
http://technet.oracle.com/tech/xml/xdk_cpp/index.htm
-
To unsubscrib
real experience with Java?
Thank you for your help. Hopefully someone will surprise me with a C++
library that supports them :)
- kaoruAngel
- Original Message -
From: "Cem Karan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:42 AM
Subje
Cem, and the list,
>I don't know of a C++ solution to your problems, but if I might ask you
>this: can you mix the Java and C++ code you have together? Using the
>JNI you should be able to access the Java parser/whatever from C++.
I've recently found a problem on both Solaris and Redhat Linux
I don't know of a C++ solution to your problems, but if I might ask you
this: can you mix the Java and C++ code you have together? Using the
JNI you should be able to access the Java parser/whatever from C++. The
downside will be speed to some degree (although on the mac and linux
sides, that sh
Hi,
XML is an inherantly text data format, so there is no built in floating
point number support in the DOM. What most people do is to treat certain
parts of the XML tree as having a floating point value, and use
string-to-number and number-to-string routines to get the numeric values
from the st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XML Schema support
>
>
> Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
>
> Tinny
>
>
> ---
Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
Tinny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
