On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Khaled Noaman wrote:
> There has been a demand for annotation support which is ignored
> after validation. I have few comments regarding your proposed
> solution. You are storing references to the appinfo/documentation
> dom nodes. First, this means that you are keeping around
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Neil Graham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just as another datapoint, there exists an (as yet unimplemented) interface
> for accessing the contents of xs:annotations in Xerces-J. Go to
> http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xerces2/index.html and look at the
> XSAnnotation class fo
Can we change the default behaviour of ln in gmake install to that of cp...
using ln -sf ? ;)
cp -fp /home/all/XML/xml-xerces/c/lib/libxerces-c.so.23.0 /usr/local/lib
(cd /usr/local/lib; ln -s libxerces-c.so.23.0 libxerces-c.so.23; ln -s
libxerces-c.so.23.0 libxerces-c.so)
ln: `libxerces-c.so':
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Bagepalli, Kiran wrote:
> A small glitch when I started using the code.
>
> If I have XML embedded in the documentation
> for eg.
>
> 12S1
>
>
> Ideally speaking if I get the documentation I would be expecting a text of
> 12S1.
> However the traverseSchema DOM eats aw
this content by
> < which is very inconvenient.
Kiran
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFC: Schema annotation support
Sure, here it is:
class VALIDATORS_EXPORT SchemaAnno
|
>
|
| cc:
|
|
> There has been a demand for annotation support which is ignored
> after validation. I have few comments regarding your proposed
> solution. You are storing references to the appinfo/documentation
> dom nodes. First, this means that you are keeping around the whole
> dom tree in memory. Second,
There has been a demand for annotation support which is ignored
after validation. I have few comments regarding your proposed
solution. You are storing references to the appinfo/documentation
dom nodes. First, this means that you are keeping around the whole
dom tree in memory. Second, once the sch
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Gareth Reakes wrote:
> Hi,
> we saw it :) We were just waiting for the most appropriate person
> to answer. I guess that has come down to me. There was some code written a
> while ago that did this. I did not make it into the last version. There is
> some demand for it
2003 09:45:46 -0500 (EST)
> From: Sir Woody Hackswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RFC: Schema annotation support
>
> Hello, all!
>
>I have a project in which I need to be able to use the
> f
uggestions)
-Richard Balint
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:45:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Sir Woody Hackswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFC: Schema annotation support
Hello, all!
I have a
Hello, all!
I have a project in which I need to be able to use the
from a schema. After hours of studying undocumented code in the validators/
directory (hint hint... why are there no docs on the validators?) I came to
the conclusion that annotations seem to be completely ignored after
va
14 matches
Mail list logo
