RE: Schema Error

ay be more relevant than mine. > -Original Message- > From: Oliver, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:29 AM > To: Xerces Dev > Subject: Schema Error > > > I am using Xerces-C++ 2.3. When attempting to validate an XML > document I g

Re: Schema Error

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Xerces Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:29 PM Subject: Schema Error I am using Xerces-C++ 2.3. When attempting to validate an XML document I get the following error... Error at file OTA_Profile.xsd, line 2, char 122 Mess

Schema Error

I am using Xerces-C++ 2.3. When attempting to validate an XML document I get the following error... Error at file OTA_Profile.xsd, line 2, char 122 Message: ID 'OTA2003A2003A' is not unique The schema file that I am using has several included schema. Each of the included schemas has an eleme

Re: Schema error and SigAbort

Hi, attach the files and I will take a look. Gareth On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Tenwit wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using SAX2, on a solaris box. I'm parsing an XML file with > a (I think) well-defined schema. Certainly XML Spy likes the > schema. The XML file parses fine when I turn off sc

Schema error and SigAbort

Hi all, I'm using SAX2, on a solaris box. I'm parsing an XML file with a (I think) well-defined schema. Certainly XML Spy likes the schema. The XML file parses fine when I turn off schema checking, just complaining about all the tags it doesn't understand. When I turn on schema checking, I g

RE: Schema error vs. Instance error?

Great points...Thanks for the guidance. I'll let you know how it worked out. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Khaled Noaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Schema error vs. Instance error?

Re: Schema error vs. Instance error?

ting mechanism. So, before traversing the schema, scanner/validator needs to switch the error handler to be the schema error handler, then switch back after traversal. >> 2. Add a method to the parser to inquire whether any errors were >> encountered during parsing a schema. >er...how?

RE: Schema error vs. Instance error?

Khaled, thanks for the reply... comment/questions inline. > Here are some suggestions: > 1. Modify the parser to register an additional error handler > that is used > by schema traversal to report errors. .. at first glance I didn't see how to do that. I'll look again but remember thinking tha

Re: Schema error vs. Instance error?

;m kinda in a bind here. > Jim > > > -Original Message- > > From: Murphy, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:39 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: Schema error vs. Instance error? > > >

RE: Schema error vs. Instance error?

Report - Apologies for the repost but I'm kinda in a bind here. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Murphy, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:39 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Schema error vs. Instance error? > &

Schema error vs. Instance error?

Hi all, I am parsing an instance with an associated schema using DOMParser. I am trying to differentiate between errors parsing the schema and errors parsing the instance. Currently I can't tell in the call to error(). This is all so I know when I can reuse grammar in the parser. Obvious