Schema-validation bug

2002-12-19 Thread Keith L. Musser
We have discovered an inconsistency between "Xerces-Java 2.0.0" and "Xerces C++ 2.1" with regard to schema validation. I believe "Xerces-Java 2.0.0" is handling this correctly, but I don't claim expertise in the intricacies of XML schema, so I'll let you decide. Below is a schema and a documen

Re: Schema Validation Bug

2002-02-06 Thread Sam Tregar
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, John Utz wrote: > hmm, i think all 3 bugs are valid, but i could be mistaken > > the simple type in include the broken int, so now it's broken. > > the element 'size' includes the simple type so now it's broken. Wait, you're saying that you can read: > > Error at file

Re: Schema Validation Bug

2002-02-06 Thread John Utz
hmm, i think all 3 bugs are valid, but i could be mistaken the simple type in include the broken int, so now it's broken. the element 'size' includes the simple type so now it's broken. On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Sam Tregar wrote: > The following bad snippet in my schema: > > > >

Schema Validation Bug

2002-02-05 Thread Sam Tregar
The following bad snippet in my schema: Generated a good error and two bad ones when trying to validate a document against it: Error at file /usr/local/bricolage-SOAP/doc_GdUs.xml, line 3, char 196 Message: maxInclusive value '+9