Hi,
I don't think I should send this to the general discussion list.
As there's no xerces-c user's - list, I have sent it to the developers list ...
Please have a look at the small schema catalog.xsd below, and the small instance
document catalog.xml.
I want to have all values of the 'name'-attr
]
Subject: Re: Questions about
Schema Support in Xerces 1.60
Hi Elisha,
The C++ parser has support for the W3C
schema language except for some limitations as noted in http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html.
o The problem with
directive is one of the limitations and will be fixed in the next
Hi Khaled,
You wrote:
>
> Here is the fix:
Thanks again! It now works (famous last words...).
Joachim
--
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (http://www.netacquire.com)
private: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (http://www.kraut.ca)
-
:-(
Here is the fix:
Index: TraverseSchema.cpp
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-xerces/c/src/validators/schema/TraverseSchema.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -r1.73 TraverseSchema.cpp
3936c3936
< fBuffer.append(xpathExpr + st
Just a quick followup:
I wrote:
>
> Below is an example that should fail the unique constraint because of the
> duplicated "bar1" value, but Xerces 1.6.0 doesn't detect this violation.
The schema I provided included a small typo. Replace
by the intended:
Note, the 3 was missing. Xerc
Dec 6, I wrote:
>
> Hi Khaled,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> > The fix is in CVS. I have attached the diff for your reference.
>
> Thanks a bundle. This appears to work now. Will these two bug fixes make
> it into the final 1.6.0 release?
Let me take this back. :-)
Union support in schema "unique" or "ke
Yes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Khaled,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> > The fix is in CVS. I have attached the diff for your reference.
>
> Thanks a bundle. This appears to work now. Will these two bug fixes make
> it into the final 1.6.0 release?
>
> Joachim
>
> --
> work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ht
Hi Khaled,
You wrote:
>
> The fix is in CVS. I have attached the diff for your reference.
Thanks a bundle. This appears to work now. Will these two bug fixes make
it into the final 1.6.0 release?
Joachim
--
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (http://www.netacquire.com)
private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're not off base. In your example, the union operator would force
uniqueness of the name attribute across both types of elements.
That's a bug.
The fix is in CVS. I have attached the diff for your reference.
Khaled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Khaled Noaman wrote:
> >
> > There is a small fix
Khaled Noaman wrote:
>
> There is a small fix that you need to apply to XUtil.cpp.
> In XUtil::getNextSiblingElementNS and XUtil::getFirstChildElementNS replace
> 'getNodeName()' with 'getLocalName()'.
>
> Would you please apply that fix, and test the parser again? If the parser is
> still ignorin
gnoring the identity constraints, would you please post an example to
the mailing list?
Thanks,
Khaled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Was trying to test the full schema support in the 1.6.0 candidate using
> saxprint.exe. I'm specifically interested in key/keyref support, but the
Hi,
Was trying to test the full schema support in the 1.6.0 candidate using
saxprint.exe. I'm specifically interested in key/keyref support, but the
parser (run with -n -s -f) seems to ignore all my key and keyref
declarations. Other schema validation appears to work.
Does anybody ha
there schema support for the xsi:type in the nightly builds by any
> chance?
>
> Thanks,
> Mohammed Zubair V
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional comm
Hi,
is there schema support for the xsi:type in the nightly builds by any
chance?
Thanks,
Mohammed Zubair V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Schema development is still on-going. We have just implemented the "all"
support. Please try the latest nightly build
(http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-c/nightly/2001-08-30/) and see if it
works for you.
Tinny
Wiessner Karsten wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to use Xerces for C++ in an ongoi
Hi there,
I'd like to use Xerces for C++ in an ongoing project
which uses XML and schemas. Unfourtunately the
schema, which is defined/standardized by 3GPP,
contains an "xsd:all" group element. In 1.5.1 Xerces
complains about this "xsd:all".
Do you know how to solve this problem?
Might be inter
Team Xerces-C,
Is there a top-level schema dependency that I can remove from 1.5.1 so that
make will no longer build-in schema support? I have no requirement for
schema and would like to tailor it out of my memory constrained embedded
application (plus my antique GNU 2.7.2 compiler is getting an
Thank you !!!
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: Tinny Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Full schema support in Xerces-C
Alfredo Muñoz wrote:
> As per the last e-mail I read about this subject, full schema support
Alfredo Muñoz wrote:
> As per the last e-mail I read about this subject, full schema support is
> expected to be ready in Xerces-C by September (Date subject to changes, etc,
> etc..)
Not really ...
The plan we posted last time was:
1. Khaled, PeiYong, and I will try to f
As per the last e-mail I read about this subject, full schema support is
expected to be ready in Xerces-C by September (Date subject to changes, etc,
etc..)
I am in a dilemma right now, if to wait till September or to code everything
in Java.because schema support is paramount for my
Hi there,
when may one expect full schema support in Xerces-C?
Thanks!
Erich
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormbringer.cc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Does the current schema support expose the type information to the
client code, or is it purely used for validation, e.g. given a schema
that defines an element 'fred' to be of type xsd:string, and given an
instance doc of
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchem
Work is underway, with no definite time for completion. See
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/schema.html.
-Original Message-
From: Lin L Feng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Schema Support Timetable?
Hi,
Does anyone know
Hi,
Does anyone know when XML Schema will be fully supported in Xerces-C?
Thanks,
Lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Tinny Ng wrote:
> Bob,
>
> This should be same as whatever currently supported in Xerces-J, i.e., the
> answer should be yes. The traverseInclude method of TraverseSchema will
> call the user's EntityResolver with the value of the schemaLocation
> attribute. The user's Ent
h whatever they
like to redirect the location.
Tinny
Bob Kline wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Tinny Ng wrote:
>
> > Just wanna to give you an update on our Schema Development progress.
> > Khaled Noaman, Pei Yong Zhang, and I have been working hard in the
> > past couple of mo
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Tinny Ng wrote:
> Just wanna to give you an update on our Schema Development progress.
> Khaled Noaman, Pei Yong Zhang, and I have been working hard in the
> past couple of months to port the Schema Support in Xerces-J to
> Xerces-C, and everything is still on
ing as how I am not yet even
a master in the usage of Schemas, yet.
Thank you for the update. Please continue to keep us informed, as some of
our projects depend upon Schema support.
- kaoruAngel
- Original Message -
From: "Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
the past
> couple of
> months to port the Schema Support in Xerces-J to Xerces-C, and
> everything is
> still on track right now. We have finished the plumbing fundamental
> work (like
> Exception handling, Schema messaging, Content model, Schema element
> decl/attribute decl
Just wanna to give you an update on our Schema Development progress. Khaled
Noaman, Pei Yong Zhang, and I have been working hard in the past couple of
months to port the Schema Support in Xerces-J to Xerces-C, and everything is
still on track right now. We have finished the plumbing fundamental
No, it doesn't, but it is planned. Xerces-j already has partial schema
support.
John
> "Awasthi, Anand" wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> does Xerces C++ parser provide Schema support for XML Validation ??
>
>
> Thanks
> Anand
--
John Snelson, Software Engin
hi,
does
Xerces C++ parser provide Schema support for XML Validation
??
Thanks
Anand
Hi,
XML is an inherantly text data format, so there is no built in floating
point number support in the DOM. What most people do is to treat certain
parts of the XML tree as having a floating point value, and use
string-to-number and number-to-string routines to get the numeric values
from the st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: XML Schema support
>
>
> Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
>
> Tinny
>
>
> ---
Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
Tinny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We are a medical device manufacturer and we are examining the
possibility of using XML documents to store aspects of our
studies( we make a non-contact heart mapping system,
Endocardial Solutions, Inc. ). I began by experimenting
with DTD's. However, there doesn't seem to be any
36 matches
Mail list logo
