Actually, the 1.0 spec doesnt mention anything about case.. it is only in
the 1.2 version that they talk about "case folding"..
The discussion the meaning of "match" in section 1.2 (Terminology) of the
1.0 specification says:
- "Two strings or names being compared must be identical."
- "No case
ak
was available :-)... I have learnt from experience that Working with XML you will get
whipped into compliance pretty fast... :-)
-Vinayak
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Pelton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:34 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECT
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: string comparisons in xerces
Dave,
The problem is when I invoke an xerces lib fn like getAttribute("xyz"). This
function internally uses the XMLString::compareString to verify if an
attribute with the name "xy
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
03/25/2003 03:49 Subject: RE: string comparisons in
xerces
ch 25, 2003 6:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: string comparisons in xerces
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How about using XMLString::compareIString()?
>
> Dave
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: string comparisons in xerces
PM
Pl
This is a simple question. Asking as I cannot access the xerces mailing list archives.
The XMLString::compareString fn performs case sensitive compares. So, for eg., if the
xml has an attribute named "Attrib" and I invoke the getAttribute fn with a param of
"attrib", then the fn will fail.
What
