RE: -u switch for DOMPrint

Thank you. Jae. -Original Message- From: Dean Roddey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: -u switch for DOMPrint For instance, create an ISO-8859-1 document, and somewhere in there use a numerical character reference

Re: -u switch for DOMPrint

t, don't buy it!" - Original Message - From: "In, Jae Woo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache XML Developer List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:10 PM Subject: -u switch for DOMPrint Could anyone suggest a method for testing the -u

-u switch for DOMPrint

Could anyone suggest a method for testing the -u switch for DOMPrint. Specifically, what is considered an unrepresentable character? Thanks in advance. Jae. <> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

RE: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

Yes, they are really forbidden.  The check is definitely done post expansion.  I even tried setCreateEntityReferenceNodes(true).  This, of course, creates the entity reference node and adds the expanded entity as a text node child of the entity reference node.  When it does that, we get the Invali

RE: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

>Can you use XML's &#xx; notation to represent the characters? Might be nice if it did, but that's not the way XML works. The forbidden characters really are completely forbidden, and have to be represented some other way. -

Re: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

At 08:10 AM 21-02-02 -0500, Thomas Bentley (Thom) wrote: >I have existing data that contains these ASCII control characters and I >need to represent them in XML. Xerces complains about them (because they >are less the 0x20), but I need to represent them in a standard way so they >can be recrea

Re: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

This is something of an XML FAQ... Most of these characters are not legal in XML, and there really is no way to represent them directly. Even numeric character references won't get you past this restriction. The standard workaround is to replace them with some other representation. There really

Re: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: RE: C0 control characters - U+ through U+001F > Can you use XML's &#xx; notation to represent the characters? > > Samar Lotia > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Bentley (Thom) [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

Can you use XML's &#xx; notation to represent the characters? Samar Lotia -Original Message- From: Thomas Bentley (Thom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 07:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: C0 control characters - U+ through U+001F Importance:

C0 control characters - U+0000 through U+001F

I have existing data that contains these ASCII control characters and I need to represent them in XML. Xerces complains about them (because they are less the 0x20), but I need to represent them in a standard way so they can be recreated at a later time, correctly. Has anyone solved this one?

RE: u

u be forty, mon -Original Message- From: Corey Lubin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12. joulukuuta 2001 3:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u u, too. - Original Message - From: "Sergey Matveychuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent

Re: u

u, too. - Original Message - From: "Sergey Matveychuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:19 PM Subject: u > u > > > > - > To unsu

u

u - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]