Greame,
The Revalidating DOMParser stuff is not hooked up in Xerces.
It probably won't get hooked up until the schema validator stuff
stabilizes. That way you'll be able to revalidate both DTD's
and schemas.
I'd be interested in seeing the problematic DTD.
Ted
- Original Message -
Fr
abagchi 99/11/22 12:54:11
Modified:c/scripts packageBinaries.pl packageSources.pl
Log:
Tuned it for packaging XML4C Version 3.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 xml-xerces/c/scripts/packageBinaries.pl
Index: packageBinaries.pl
=
abagchi 99/11/22 12:41:27
Modified:c/src/util/Platforms/Win32 Win32PlatformUtils.cpp
Log:
Changed 'intlFiles/Locales' to 'icu/data'
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -1
xml-xerces/c/src/util/Platforms/Win32/Win32PlatformUtils.cpp
Index: Win32PlatformUtils.cpp
> So, do we have an agreement on these "XML serializing" classes? I think
> so.
>
> And I think Assaf can go ahead and drop them in. Anyone against this?
Is that org.apache.xerces.serialize or org.apache.xml.serialize?
arkin
>
> --
> Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself
Who at IBM participated in this OASIS effort? It wasn't my group.
I'll contact them to see what we can about getting our additional tests
in there.
Mike
David Brownell wrote:
>
> "Rajiv Mordani [CONTRACTOR]" wrote:
> >
> > We here use the OASIS test suite for xml conformance. That is freely
>
I just tried out Xerces 1.0 RevalidatingDOMParser as
XML4J 2.0.15 was barfing on my DTD.
Is it the expected behavior that if elements are missing
(ie specified in the DTD)
from an XML document that the parser doesnt complain ?
Graeme Wallace
Technical Director
Interactive Network Technologies
290
