Court Demas wrote:
>
> Is the DOM functionality going to be duplicated between OpenXML and
> Xerces? Why not just have a single codebase for these things? (Licensing
> issues?) Usable HTML parsers are very hard to come by (ICEsoft has the
> only one I know of that deals well with bad html) and
Is the DOM functionality going to be duplicated between OpenXML and
Xerces? Why not just have a single codebase for these things? (Licensing
issues?) Usable HTML parsers are very hard to come by (ICEsoft has the
only one I know of that deals well with bad html) and quite difficult to
implement p
- Original Message -
From: Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: regular build schedule
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > 4. Build the release & test (Ted & IBM)
>
> Do you want me to create the
I think it's good enough and certainly seems to be complaint with the
specs.
arkin
(HTML parser will be coming, just as soon as I finish some DSML stuff)
Court Demas wrote:
>
> I've hacked up an implementation of the HTMLDocument.write() and
> writeln() methods. It's cheese but functional. I
Maybe I'm being dense but I can't figure out how to define a text or external
entity in an XML instance document and reference that
entity later in the same document. In a DTD based XML, you'd define the entity
in the internal DTD subset then reference it later
in the content. But...
An ENTITY
Ok... I lost basically one day of E-Mails (my DSL @ home is DOWN, and I
had to turn all email somewhere else, a thing I can't control from
italy). But we have 3 +1 (Stefano, Assaf and Scott) and no -1 (correct
me if I'm wrong).
Brian, can you open an account for Arnaud?
Pier (angry like a
I've hacked up an implementation of the HTMLDocument.write() and writeln()
methods. It's cheese but functional. I'm wondering if it would
be interesting to have this added or if somebody is already working on
implementing it the Right Way.
The idea is to just build up a string of what was writt
Here are some example patches documenting a few leaks we found. Let
me know if these look ok.
These are diff'ed against the Xerces-C-src_1_0_0.zip drop. Looks like
they are still in the latest cvs version of the code at this time. We
were stuffing SAXException's into a stl container, hence the add
I've run across a NullPointerException when parsing an XML document against
a schema and when that schema references an ENTITY in the content of a
textEntity delcaration that was defined in the internal DTD of the schema.
Wow, the sample code is shorter than the description!
I've just started work
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Donald Ball wrote:
> export XERCESCROOT=/home/balld/src/xml-xerces/c
> sh runConfigure -p linux
> make
Thanks! This did the trick. BTW, the "make install"
is creating non-standard directories in /usr/local
(by default). This is bad. Most of these
directories should be un
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> I cannot build the "c" version of today's snapshot
> on a stock RH 6.1 Pentium box.
>
> I ran configure, and it tried to create /obj and /lib
> So, I looked at the Makefile, and it did not define
> XCERESCROOT, after defining this, it got a few more
>
I cannot build the "c" version of today's snapshot
on a stock RH 6.1 Pentium box.
I ran configure, and it tried to create /obj and /lib
So, I looked at the Makefile, and it did not define
XCERESCROOT, after defining this, it got a few more
lines into the Makefile and tried to create /include/lib
H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In lieu of getting something automated in place, I think that we
> should have a 1.0.1 binary build of Xerces-J. I also volunteer
> myself (and IBM) as the release coordinator for this build. Please
> let me know if you have any objections to this.
No objections at
Assaf Arkin wrote:
>
> > Can we have some bunches of +1 please :) :) :) :)
>
> +1
>
> And welcome aboard.
+1 as well.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Based on Scott's, Stefano's and other contributors I've revamped the
Serializer interface with the following changes:
BaseSerializer has been renamed BaseMarkupSerializer, it's only
intention in life is to be part of the XML/HTML/XHML serializer
implementation.
DOMSerializer has been added as an
15 matches
Mail list logo
