If I can't get XML working in my product real soon, I'm going to have to advice
my
client that we should abandon the use of XML.
The main reason I couldn't get it to work is that the Win32 transcoder doesn't
work under Metrowerks Codewarrior. But Erik Ulevik posted a new one here:
http://xml-
Has anyone run across a "stripped down" DOM implementation
in the spirit of the AElfred SAX parser? Maybe something
that intentionally violates the interface by refusing to
report siblings/parents, but is small as a result?
By the way, does someone know the status of AElfred?
The microstar site se
Is the Xerces C++ library multi-thread safe?
Regards.
Dean Hoover
The web page http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/releases.html announces
Xerces C++ Parser Version 1.1.0 on January 28, 2000, but I cannot
locate the release on http://xml.apache.org/dist/
Is the announcement premature?
On a related note, the first bullet in the announcement states
Simplified platform
At 02:30 PM 2/5/00 +0100, Armin Pfarr wrote:
>It is astonishing for somebody who has some knowledge of SGML (like me) that
>the CDATA construct in XML differs from the one in SGML at all AND STILL
>USES THE SAME NAME.
I believe that XML and SGML have the same handling for CDATA attributes.
>The
Hello Mike,
thank to your comments, I got the point.
I already had the annotated spec at hand. I looked up 3.3.1 "Attribute
Types" which states StringType::='CDATA'. There is no description there and
also no annotation. Since this IS something new in XML, I'd at least mention
it here.
It is asto
Hi,
I just got on the list last night, and posted a message about having problems
with
the Win32 transcoder in my port to Metrowerks Codewarrior for Windows.
Basically the problem seems to be that the wide char functions provided in the
codewarrior runtime appear to be broken.
Eric Ulevik me
Yep... I was just about to do so... I just downloaded BugZilla and i'm
going to install it on my machine here (so, if I screw up something,
it's not going to hurt anyone!).
Then I'll move the installation over to xml.apache.org...
Pier
Mike Pogue wrote:
>
> Working on it. The PMC vote i
Working on it. The PMC vote is over, and Bugzilla was approved.
I'm trying to get Pier to install it ASAP -- but, he is also quite busy,
so I've suggested that he can talk to you, Ted, for assistance!
:-)
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked in
I had way too much caffeine and way too much free time yesterday so that wasn't
helping any. Your fix works fine, of course.
Thanks, george
-Original Message-
From: Andy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BUG java.la
I will repeat after you:
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
He reported the problem directly to me, I tracked it down to the faulty
line and have no clue how to proceed. I'm afraid of breaking something
that might be required for DOM L2 support.
So I'm asking if someone knows what, why and ho
If he didn't report the bug here, nobody has looked into it.
Repeat after me:
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
WE NEED A BUG TRACKING SYSTEM -- NOW!
- Original Message ---
Mark,
You should expect to see another release of Xerces soon. The plan was
to do a release at the end of last week, and then SAX2 went and changed
all over the place, so it was decided to wait a week or so until the changes
could be made. The current CVS version conforms to the 12/17 syntax.
T
Apologies if I've asked a common question, but I couldn't find the answer
anywhere. When is the next release of the Xerces Java parser coming out?
Will it support the latest moving target coming out of the Schema WG?
markl
14 matches
Mail list logo
