XML4C Version 3.1.0 actually compiles and builds out of the box on OS/390.
Please download it directly from IBM's AlphaWorks site
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com. It is based on Xerces-C 1.1.0.
- Anupam
Anupam Bagchi
Advisory Software Engineer
XML Dev
Can anyone give me a ballpark estimate on when the C++ version of xerces
will include support for xml-schemas? Could you please point me at the
relevant source modules where these changes will be made so that I may
monitor them for updates?
Thanks in advance!
Yen Trinh wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. As suggested, I will try to use
> XML4J. Is it possible to invoke a XML parser in Java from main
> function in C?
I'm not a 390 person either, so you'd have to ask somebody other than me!
> I desperately need XML4C for OS390
No, you can't do this. A lot of HTML is "not well-formed XML", or "badly
formed XML",
and so the parser will generate errors.
Here's another example,
123456789
generates an XML well-formedness error, but it's also ambiguous.
Should it generate:
start b
text 123
start i
text 456
end b
text 7
Mike,
Thank you very much for your reply. As suggested, I will try to use
XML4J. Is it possible to invoke a XML parser in Java from main
function in C?
I desperately need XML4C for OS390 for my project. I am pretty new on
OS390 and C++ programming as well. The sooner I can get a copy of XML4C
The TreeViewer sample is available only in Xerces-J version, while
CreateDOMDocument is available only in the latest Xerces-C 1.1.0. Both can
be downloaded from http://xml.apache.org/dist.
Chih-Hsiang Chou
IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
The segment
#if defined (XML_GNUG)
#include
#endif
... is some legacy code that must now be:
#if defined (XML_GCC)
#include
#endif
The above change has been done in the source code. Thanks for pointing it
out.
- Anupam
Anupam Bagchi
Advisory S
The new COM wrappers do not compile properly yet. Please hold on for a
couple of days more till we can stabilize it. Thanks,
- Anupam
Anupam Bagchi
Advisory Software Engineer
XML Development Group, IBM Cupertino
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROT
I was too but this the only thing I can come up with and I'm hoping someone
might be able to correct me:
The DOM parser is built off the SAX parser which in itself wouldn't need
well-formedness but because the DOM parser needs proper end tags, etc. the
SAX parser does also I was assuming that
IBM's isn't released anywhere yet (I don't know of anybody who has seen it yet,
but that group has
indicated an interest in contributing it to xml.apache.org).
Sun's might be part of the stuff they just released on their website. (Can
somebody check?)
The OpenXML one is the same as the one b
Can anyone send us links to the Sun and IBM versions please? Are these
Java or C++ implementations? I'm using the java Tidy html parser because
the OpenXML one is way too unforgiving of unwellformed HTML. But I'd
prefer to use something else (also java) because Tidy's not built for
speed.
Th
Yen,
The IBM 390 people plan to have a OS/390 version available (using the latest
Xerces code base) in
60-90 days. In the meantime, as an alternative, you may use XML4J on OS/390,
if you wish.
XML4C is no longer available for download from IBM, but you can probably
contact IBM directly, if
yo
Note that we have a couple of people who would like to donate an
HTML parser to xml.apache.org, to be added to Xerces. The ones I know of
are:
ExOffice (extremely well tested, used for web spiders),
Sun (I haven't seen it yet), and
IBM (I haven't seen it yet either).
I just tried to compile them, but midl couldn't find xmldom.idl
-Original Message-
From: Mike Pogue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: COM Wrappers for Xerces
Maybe somebody should see if they do anything, before we announ
Maybe somebody should see if they do anything, before we announce them? :-)
Mike
Jeff Lewis wrote:
>
> I see from the CVS that the COM Wrappers for Xerces have been added to the
> tree, but I haven't seen an official announcement. Do I dare start
> using/testing these?
>
> (I fetched the CVS
I see from the CVS that the COM Wrappers for Xerces have been added to the
tree, but I haven't seen an official announcement. Do I dare start
using/testing these?
(I fetched the CVS tree at about 9:15 this morning...)
Thanks
We just tried to move a production application from one of our development
machines to a server. When doing so, we bumped into a little problem with
the Win32TransService. It seems that it looks into:
\\HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\MIME\Database\Charset
Which is perfectly happy and full of all sorts of us
Heather,
You can look into HTMLTidy utility: http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/
Partially supported by HP, BTW.
Thanks,
Dmitry Volpyansky
- Original Message -
From: "Cox Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: HTML parsing
If the HTML is not well-formed XML (which most is not), you are correct.
Andy
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 10:32 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: HTML parsing
|
|
| For what I can tell, I cannot expect to be a
Hi Jim,
Yes, I agree. One of use here screwed up the packaging. It really
makes me wonder which copy of the project file I checked, when
I posted my response on this earlier. It must have been a fresh
checkout from CVS.
Sorry about this. I will make sure we get a correctly packaged
source archive
Well, I hope it can be done. Couldn't you just trap elements that contain
the tag IMG as you parse the Instance? You know like using startElement and
EndElement. I would be blown away if the Sax Parser couldn't handle this.
Regards,
Ward
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
For what I can tell, I cannot expect to be able to parse an HTML doc with the
xerces parser? I was hoping to use the C++ SAX parser to find tags but I
don't think I will be able to do that. Can someone confirm this dreadful fact?
Thanks,
Heather Matthews
>Mr. Muehlenhoff, since those features are part of SAX2 core features
>I would think that it is very likely that they will be implemented.
>I would encourage you and any other people reading the forum to submit
>contributions. If you think that you can have an implementation of these
>features a
Mr. Muehlenhoff, since those features are part of SAX2 core features
I would think that it is very likely that they will be implemented.
I would encourage you and any other people reading the forum to submit
contributions. If you think that you can have an implementation of these
features and hav
Binoy wrote:
>hi,
> xsl parser for java seems to be slow ?. it's much noticable when i
>used it to traslate
>5+ documents ,it take time to load VM again and again .Do you have any xsl
>parsers in c++ ,
>or can suggest an alternative
>we could had a round about way if xsl parser for java were a
Title: RE: Exception in DeferredDocumentImpl.synchronizeChildren
I have a similar problem that occurs both with DeferredDocumentImpl and DocumentImpl. After a number (big!) of accesses the document returns null pointers from the standard access methods (not just synchronizeChildren).
-Mikael
Hello,
how greate is the chance to get the features
http://xml.org/sax/features/external-general-entities
http://xml.org/sax/features/external-parameter-entities
working in the near future? It would be very nice to have this feature,
because I have to parse XML-DTD's (generated with XMI) t
A while back (the end of January if I recall) I posted to this list to see
whether anyone was porting, or considering porting, Xerces-C onto Compaq Tru64
(aka Digital Unix).
Thanks to all who responded, even if it was to say that Tru64 was an
unsupported platform.
I've now got to the stage where
Yes, that is because I put the fix on Friday.
Jeffrey Rodriguez
IBM Cupertino
From: "Timm, Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: SAX2 bug in Xerces-J 1.0.3
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:06:41 -0700
This is fixed in the latest co
This is fixed in the latest code in CVS, but it is not reflected in any
currently released build.
- Sean T.
-Original Message-
From: Box, Don
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 3/12/00 7:14 PM
Subject: SAX2 bug in Xerces-J 1.0.3
When creating an instance of org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParse
Don, I set feature http://xml.org/features/namespaces to true in the
org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser.
I put this fix on Friday. Any comments about this? I test this change
against Meggison example about namespaces.
Thanks,
Jeffrey Rodriguez
XML Development
IBM Cupertino
From: "Box, Don" <[EMAI
Title: SAX2 bug in Xerces-J 1.0.3
When creating an instance of org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser, the initial state of the "http://xml.org/features/namespaces" feature is false. This feature should default to true (see http://www.megginson.com/SAX/SAX2/namespaces.html for more info).
DB
htt
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
33 matches
Mail list logo
