Now that 1.1.0 is out, I'm re-synchronizing my patches for the OS/2 port.
The following patches are for existing files in the CVS tree. This doesn't
include any new files, so there's more to follow. I wanted to get patches for
existing files in so that I don't have to keep hand-merging updates. (I
Jens Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I agree "(foo*)?" make no sence, but this could not be the reason for
> xerces to change this to an illegal expression like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> (because this
> doesn´t fits to the xml grammer).
If you'd like to submit a patch to fix this behavior, I'd be
happy to commi
Gerd Mueller wrote:
> But if I understand the specification and the implementation of Xerces right I
> have to add event listeners for _each_ mutation event type to _every_ node of
> the tree to be notified of any mutation - is this right ?
Events in the DOM can "bubble" up the tree. Section 6.2.3
> Jarek Wilkiewicz wrote:
> I used the sample test code by Andy Clark
> http://xml-archive.webweaving.org/xml-archive-xerces/0852.html , my
That message I posted was when I first started using the
serializers and there were bugs in the DOM serialization
code.
> classpath has DOM Level 1 Core w3c
Johan Mörén wrote:
> multiplies every linebreak break by two. So a two-line content have, after
> the first save, an empty line between the two original lines. For each
I wonder if you are getting CR-LF from the browser which gets
inserted directly into your text and then the serialization
process
Mike Pogue wrote:
>
> I haven't seen the Sun one, though, so I think we should take a look
> before we start checking in the OpenXML one. Let's look at all the
> possibilities, before we choose one.
Sounds good to me... Less stuff to do if we decide to go w/ Sun :)
Pier
--
---
Hello,
I used the sample test code by Andy Clark http://xml-archive.webweaving.org/xml-archive-xerces/0852.html
, my classpath has DOM Level 1 Core w3c classes (that come with JAXP
distribution) before the rest of the xerces (1.0.3) distribution, and I get the
following error :
xception i
I've fixed it locally but not checked it in because its wound up in some
other changes that I'm not quite done with. I will get it checked in today.
I'm working on the two way transcoding, and I think I'll have enough to
check in a first whack at that today. It won't be necessarily fully baked,
I'd already fixed the code to build xerces for SUN CC 5.0. If you extract
the source code from cvs and build it should work. Let me know if
you face any problem with that. This change took place day after the release
of xerces 1.1.0 and I posted a message here after that.
Arundhati
Gary Heiligma
I propose we wait and see what Sun has, before we pull the OpenXML one in.
After talking with the IBM folks in Tokyo, I suspect that the IBM HTML parser
will *not* be suitable
for our needs (at this point, I think OpenXML is better, because it supports
HTML 4.0, instead of
3.2, and it handles th
Using xerces1_0_3 on a UNIX system.
We update a cdata_section_node with the input from a on JSP-page.
The data is inserted in the document with setNodeValue() and later the
document is serialized with the serializer. However each time we update the
document (after serializing it to disk and readi
Did anyone ever get a chance to look at this?
I have been checking the files in CVS for any changes,
but haven't yet seen anything in util\transcoders\win32.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jeffrey Rodriguez wrote:
> Mr. Muehlenhoff, since those features are part of SAX2 core features
> I would think that it is very likely that they will be implemented.
>
> I would encourage you and any other people reading the forum to submit
> contributions. If you th
Hello!
> At best I'd say its a redundant construct. There would never be a time when
> something like this:
>
> (foo@)@
>
> would make sense where @ is any repetition operator. What is the meaning of
> something like "foo one or more times, as many times as you want"? It
> probably should be
Hi,
I've got a question regarding the mutation events:
I write an application which needs to be notified about _any_ mutation of a
DOM tree and I think the DOM event model is suitable to handle this (?).
But if I understand the specification and the implementation of Xerces right I
have to add
Similar comments for setters that accept a string: should you check for both
null
and zero-length string before assigning?
For setMethod method in OutputFormat, why not pass an instance of Method
instead of
String?
cheers,
Wong
Assaf Arkin wrote:
> You have some sharp eyes :-)
>
> arkin
>
> W
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I continue to try Cocoon 1.7 with tomcat 3.1b1 on my AS/400.
> I also use xerces 1.0.3 and xalan 0.20.0 (all three seems to work fine on my
> Redhat Linux 6.1)
>
> I've got the following message.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Publishing Engine could not be initialized.
> ja
Mike Pogue wrote:
>
> Note that we have a couple of people who would like to donate an
> HTML parser to xml.apache.org, to be added to Xerces. The ones I know of
> are:
>
> ExOffice (extremely well tested, used for web spiders),
> Sun (I haven't seen it yet), and
> IBM (I
You have some sharp eyes :-)
arkin
Wong Kok Wai wrote:
>
> A quick comment: In QName, the localname checking is only for null. Should add
> checking for zero-length string too?
A quick comment: In QName, the localname checking is only for null. Should add
checking for zero-length string too?
Sometime back there was talk about breaking up the mailing lists to
xerces-c and xerces-j and I don't think that anyone opposed that. So what
happened?? Why aren't there 2 lists??
- Rajiv
--
:wq!
sorry, forgot to include version
details.
Xerces-J 1.0.3, Windows 2000,
JDK1.3rc1
seems to happen with jdk1.2.2 (no HotSpot) as
well.
this is a real showstopper for us. it can take 30-40
seconds for the nextNode method to finish.
is using a treewalker with a nodefilter the
correct
Thanks :-)
arkin
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> In org.apache.xml.serialize.Serializer, the line
>
> * Both methods would produce a full XML document, to serizlie only
>
> should be
>
> Both methods would produce a full XML d
Andy Clark wrote:
>
> Assaf Arkin wrote:
> > * Separates interfaces from implementation, all interfaces have been
> > placed in the package org.xml.serialize, implementation remains in
> > org.apache.xml.serialize
>
> I thought that org.xml package was owned by OASIS. Are we allowed
> to drop thi
Oh well, might as well leave it in, since I've added that since the 3.1.0
release to make them all more consistent :-) We were just using the
"Psychic Companion Documentation Tool".
Dean Roddey
Software Weenie
IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Val
I have successfully built Xerces-C 1.1.0, using the Sun Visual Workshop
C++ 5.0 compiler on a Sun Sparc Ultra 2 running Solaris 7.
Note that users of C++ 5.0 cannot use the binaries generated with the
(now obsolete) C++ 4.2 compiler; see
http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2/coll.32.5/CPPMIGRATE/@Ab2PageView
> As a relative newcomer to the SAX and XML world, I am interested in
> others' approaches to designing Servlet->Parser applications.
> I also have a few specific questions about how SAX parsers work.
>
> An xml file is sent to our servlet via a multi-part http post. Because SAX
> uses an InputSo
27 matches
Mail list logo
