Perhaps I should have been a bit more clear what I consider 'feature':
If xerces uses some library function, which needs header files bla.h on
linux and header files bla.h and fasel.h as well as an extra lib on
solaris, then one could write a test to be included in the configure
script, that check
Hi,
I have looked into the platform files for solaris and linux.
They look totally different if one looks at diff. But essentially the
difference is quite small. Wouldn't it be better to move from
'platform-dependent' files to 'feature-dependent'?
It should be alot easier to maintain and to port.
Hi,
I found that none of the objects get copied to obj, if there is an error
in building one of the objects, you should check your build before,
because it continues seemlessly.
Axel
I compiled here on solaris 2.7 without no problems as well.
Which make are you using? (I used GNUmake.)
Axel
Michael Burbidge wrote:
>
> Is someone working on a C++ version of Xalan? If so, what's the time frame
> for its release?
>
> Mike-
Yes, see
http://xml.apache.org/xalan/xslt4c.html
for details. It's for windows only at the time.
Axel
Hi,
I was looking into building Xalan-C++ on Solaris and therefor
Xerces-C++.
I found the build system of Xerces a bit harsh to get along, at least
for people new to it.
Has there been any discussion about whether to use libtool, and stay a
bit closer to the directory-standards in autoconf-automa
