- Original Message -
From: Laura Neitzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: [Xerces-J] XMLSchemaValidator and errors
> Can I butt in here and ask a simple question? I've just started to use
CTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xerces-J] XMLSchemaValidator and errors
Thanks for the reply, Andy. That's what I was afraid of . Since I
need to get this thing working, I'd be happy to make some contributions in
the following schem
nesday February 23, 2000 06:51 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Kito Mann/PSG/Prudential)
Subject: Re: [Xerces-J] XMLSchemaValidator and errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> exceptions to be thrown from the parser's parse() meth
:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xerces-J] XMLSchemaValidator and errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> exceptions to be thrown from the parser's parse() method. The result,
> however, is that the XMLSchemaValidator catches it in the loadSchema()
> method, and prints out t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> exceptions to be thrown from the parser's parse() method. The result,
> however, is that the XMLSchemaValidator catches it in the loadSchema()
> method, and prints out the stack trace. Is this really the desirable
You are completely correct, this should be changed. Our
Hey... I'm currently working with XML schemas to validate data input on the
client (a bit of a different use). Consequently, when I validate a
document, I want an immediate response if there is problem (via an
exception or a return code or something). My org.xml.sax.ErrorHandler
implementation sim
