Dear Mr. Bray,
> I believe that XML and SGML have the same handling for CDATA attributes.
You are rigth. I was mixing up the SGML-standard and HTML 4. Even though
HTML is
just an SGML-application, the Browsers are much more liberate in treating
markup-errors.
When running my docs against nsgmls, h
At 02:30 PM 2/5/00 +0100, Armin Pfarr wrote:
>It is astonishing for somebody who has some knowledge of SGML (like me) that
>the CDATA construct in XML differs from the one in SGML at all AND STILL
>USES THE SAME NAME.
I believe that XML and SGML have the same handling for CDATA attributes.
>The
Hello Mike,
thank to your comments, I got the point.
I already had the annotated spec at hand. I looked up 3.3.1 "Attribute
Types" which states StringType::='CDATA'. There is no description there and
also no annotation. Since this IS something new in XML, I'd at least mention
it here.
It is asto
