ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: HTML DOM implementation
> Mike Pogue wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I agree -- thanks, Arkin! This is great!
>
> Same here. Let's keep it up :)
>
> --
> Stefano Mazzo
Mike Pogue wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree -- thanks, Arkin! This is great!
Same here. Let's keep it up :)
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Niet
The HTML DOM implementation has been committed to the code base with the
ElementImpl fix (thanks Ted).
There are now to additional packages:
org.w3c.dom.html contains the Level 2 HTML DOM (does not require
Level 2 DOM)
org.apache.html.dom contains the implementation
To construct a new
ElementImpl.getValue is bogus. Your fix is fine.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 11:46 AM
Subject: HTML DOM implementation
> I've ported the OpenXML HTML DOM to work on top of
Yes, I agree -- thanks, Arkin! This is great!
Mike
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Assaf Arkin wrote:
> >
> > Providing HTML functionality to Xerces requires adding three packages:
> > the HTML DOM (org.w3c.dom.html), a Xerces HTML implementation, and the
> > parser (separate code base than the
Assaf Arkin wrote:
>
> Providing HTML functionality to Xerces requires adding three packages:
> the HTML DOM (org.w3c.dom.html), a Xerces HTML implementation, and the
> parser (separate code base than the XML parser). This will increase the
> JAR size by an additional 100KB, it might (or might not
I've ported the OpenXML HTML DOM to work on top of the Xerces DOM. This
implementation is currently available in the OpenXML release under the
package name org.apache.html.dom. If Xerces is available in the
classpath, the OpenXML HTML parser will now use the Xerces HTML DOM
rather than the OpenXML
