> That's why we're friends, isn't it? :) Anyway thanks for helping :)
Not a problem. Rock and roll.. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java + XML / Portable Code + Portable Data
James Duncan Davidson wrote:
>
> > Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on
> > 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11
> > minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance...
>
> Well, Pier is pretty quick. Of course it helped
> Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on
> 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11
> minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance...
Well, Pier is pretty quick. Of course it helped that he called me up asking
"where the he
Jeff Mackay wrote:
>
> Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on
> 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11
> minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance...
It depends on the timezone you're talking about... I got an email s
urday, February 26, 2000 12:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JAXP Version 1.0
The "Java API for XML Parsing" version 1.0 is out, and I believe we're
the first ones to support it :)
http://java.sun.com/xml
Pier
PS. Since there's no reference implementation for the
The "Java API for XML Parsing" version 1.0 is out, and I believe we're
the first ones to support it :)
http://java.sun.com/xml
Pier
PS. Since there's no reference implementation for the current JAXP spec.
-right now- I uploaded my implementation of the javax.xml.parser
package. It's not
