Re: Question on SAX2...

2000-02-10 Thread Andy Clark
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > Don't lie :) You forgot to update it yesterday :) > CVS logs tell me that you uploaded the deprecated version 4 hours ago, > so, the one I downloaded yesterday WAS NOT deprecated :) :) At the time I made the statement, I though that it was updated. But then I checked a

Re: Question on SAX2...

2000-02-09 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
Andy Clark wrote: > > Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > > I've seen in the original SAX2 file I got that DocumentHandler has > > been deprecated, while the one coming with Xerces, in CVS, right now > > is not? > > Actually, the DocumentHandler in Xerces is also deprecated. > The SAX2beta people deprec

Re: Question on SAX2...

2000-02-09 Thread Andy Clark
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > I've seen in the original SAX2 file I got that DocumentHandler has > been deprecated, while the one coming with Xerces, in CVS, right now > is not? Actually, the DocumentHandler in Xerces is also deprecated. The SAX2beta people deprecated a lot of the original SAX stu

Re: Question on SAX2...

2000-02-09 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > > Another thing.. Why the setLexicalHandler() in SAXParser is protected? Sorry... Next time I'll look @ the API documentation (setProperty!) Pier -- - P I

Re: Question on SAX2...

2000-02-09 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > > I've seen in the original SAX2 file I got that DocumentHandler has > been deprecated, while the one coming with Xerces, in CVS, right now > is not? > Is this a willing thing or just a forgotten thing? Another thing.. Why the setLexicalHandler() in SAXParser is prote

Question on SAX2...

2000-02-09 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
I've seen in the original SAX2 file I got that DocumentHandler has been deprecated, while the one coming with Xerces, in CVS, right now is not? Is this a willing thing or just a forgotten thing? Pier -- - P