Re: JAXP Version 1.0

2000-02-29 Thread James Duncan Davidson
> That's why we're friends, isn't it? :) Anyway thanks for helping :) Not a problem. Rock and roll.. :) -- James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Java + XML / Portable Code + Portable Data

Re: JAXP Version 1.0

2000-02-28 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
James Duncan Davidson wrote: > > > Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on > > 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11 > > minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance... > > Well, Pier is pretty quick. Of course it helped

Re: JAXP Version 1.0

2000-02-28 Thread James Duncan Davidson
> Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on > 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11 > minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance... Well, Pier is pretty quick. Of course it helped that he called me up asking "where the he

Re: JAXP Version 1.0

2000-02-26 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
Jeff Mackay wrote: > > Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on > 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11 > minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance... It depends on the timezone you're talking about... I got an email s

RE: JAXP Version 1.0

2000-02-26 Thread Jeff Mackay
Now that's what I would call response time! The spec was released on 2/25/00, and the implementation is available on 2/26/00? Gee, just 11 minutes earlier and Xerces could claim same-day conformance... -Original Message- From: Pierpaolo Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday,