RE: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-06 Thread Arnold, Curt
One of the things on my to do list is to make an attempt to use XSLT to "preprocess" a lot of the nastier stuff (import, include, equivClass's, type inheritance) out of an XML Schema, just leaving the fundamental information that a validator needs (the normalized XML Schema). I don't know how f

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-06 Thread Ted Leung
- Original Message - From: "Arnold, Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 12:20 PM Subject: RE: Schemas and Namespaces > >>We're definitely trying to get Xerces up the 12/17 draft (and successive > >&

RE: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-04 Thread Arnold, Curt
>>We're definitely trying to get Xerces up the 12/17 draft (and successive >>drafts). The holidays have contributed to some slowness on this. The other >>thing is >>that lots of parts of the spec have changed, and in ways that will force major >>changes in the way that validation currently works

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-04 Thread Ted Leung
- Original Message - From: "Brett McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ted Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Schemas and Namespaces > Ted Leung wrote: > > > > I se

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-04 Thread Brett McLaughlin
Ted Leung wrote: > > I see that Henry Thompson has answered your question over in xml-dev. > In general, questions like this are more appropriate for xml-dev, since some > of > the people from the Schema Working Group actually hang out there. Yeah, thanks. I figured that out when I got an answer

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

2000-01-04 Thread Ted Leung
here. Ted - Original Message - From: "Brett McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 31, 1999 3:11 PM Subject: Re: Schemas and Namespaces > Ted- > > First, thanks so much for the response. You have saved my (and my >

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

1999-12-31 Thread Brett McLaughlin
Ted- First, thanks so much for the response. You have saved my (and my editor's ;-) ) day. I seehow they have somewhat changed in regards to this. Let me see if I understand this correctly, and thanks for your response again: My XML doc: and then my schema: http://

Re: Schemas and Namespaces

1999-12-31 Thread twleung
Brett, This has changed in the 12/17 working draft. See 4 of the draft. Ted - Original Message - From: Brett McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 8:45 PM Subject: Schemas and Namespaces > Question on Schema within XML: > > So I und