Re: Xerces Validation

1999-11-24 Thread Tim Bray
At 02:40 PM 11/24/99 -0500, Rick Graham wrote: >> Is it the expected behavior that if elements are missing >> (ie specified in the DTD) >> from an XML document that the parser doesnt complain ? > >Not sure what all of the spec is, but I do know that an XML parser is >required to stop processing a

Re: Xerces Validation

1999-11-24 Thread Rick Graham
Graeme Wallace wrote: > I just tried out Xerces 1.0 RevalidatingDOMParser as > XML4J 2.0.15 was barfing on my DTD. > > Is it the expected behavior that if elements are missing > (ie specified in the DTD) > from an XML document that the parser doesnt complain ? Not sure what all of the spec is, b

Re: Xerces Validation

1999-11-22 Thread twleung
--- Original Message - From: "Graeme Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 8:20 AM Subject: Xerces Validation > I just tried out Xerces 1.0 RevalidatingDOMParser as > XML4J 2.0.15 was barfing on my DTD. > > Is it th

Xerces Validation

1999-11-22 Thread Graeme Wallace
I just tried out Xerces 1.0 RevalidatingDOMParser as XML4J 2.0.15 was barfing on my DTD. Is it the expected behavior that if elements are missing (ie specified in the DTD) from an XML document that the parser doesnt complain ? Graeme Wallace Technical Director Interactive Network Technologies 290