Christoph Kliemt wrote:
>
> ->"Josh" == Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> gpl? (em... err... or is this a
> "ibm-community-i-dont-realy-trust-gpl" license?!) ;)
The Apache license is most definitely *not* GPL -- if it were, you
couldn't use the code without making your soft
Josh Bers wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a question about the licensing terms of Xerces C++ libraries.
> We are
> interested in using it in a commercial product. After reading the
> license.txt file I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. What is the nature of the code that is copyright IBM? Wh
->"Josh" == Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
gpl? (em... err... or is this a
"ibm-community-i-dont-realy-trust-gpl" license?!) ;)
Josh> I appreciate your help on this,
Josh> Josh
\\// christoph
--
Java ist die Fortsetzung von C mit anderen Mitteln.
Hello,
I have a question about the licensing terms of Xerces C++ libraries. We
are
interested in using it in a commercial product. After reading the
license.txt file I have a couple of questions:
1. What is the nature of the code that is copyright IBM? What kind of
copyright is this? Wher
