DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5323] - wrong newline normalization ?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5323] New: - wrong newline normalization ?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Problem using xalan with xerces2

>I was just wondering if anyone from Xerces is tracking this? Both Elena and Andy have shown interest; I don't know where it is on their priority lists. >Signficantly, the Xalan smoketest fails with Xerces2 and succeeds with >Xerces1. Xerces2 beta 3, when operated in incremental mode, is faili

Re: patch for XMLSchemaValidator

I have a more fundamental question: whether a schema validator should fire ignorableWhitespace() calls. >From the xml-infoset spec, each character information item has a property [element content whitespace]. In xerces, ignorableWhitespace() is fired for whitespaces whose such property has the va

Re: patch for XMLSchemaValidator

> ignorableWhitespace() is not called when the passed string is whitespace. > Hence "dom/include-ignorable-whitespace" feature [false] doesn't work. This may or may not be a problem, as I do not quite know the calling context of the modification, or under which circumstances fSawCharacters is s

Re: namespaces feature

The URI you reference is not part of the specification for SAX, it is just some ancillary documentation. The JavaDoc makes no such statements. However, in the same "area", it also states that: http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces true: Perform Namespace processing. false: Optionall

Re: [Xerces2] Recent XNI Changes

Andy Clark wrote: > PROBLEM: None of the XNI samples were updated to include this > parameter which means that they will not behave as they should. Andy, I did update samples. Since you are complaining I guess I missed some files...? The samples that were updated in xni package are: DocumentTrac

Re: Sax feature should throw SAXNotSupportedException.

>Agreed, spec says that external-general-entities cannot be false when >validation is true but what will be behaviour of the praser when validation is >true and external-general-entities is false ?? You just said the exact same thing twice, so I don't understand what you are asking. A valida

Re: Sax feature should throw SAXNotSupportedException.

Glenn wrote: > > Right now, we can set feature > > http://xml.org/sax/features/external-general-entities to true even if we > have > > http://xml.org/sax/features/validation to false. It should throw the > > SAXNotSupportedException as per SAX specification. > > You are misreading the specifi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5317] New: - DeclHandler implementation does not follow documentation.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

patch for XMLSchemaValidator

Hi, Please find the attached patch for XMLSchemaValidator. ignorableWhitespace() is not called when the passed string is whitespace. Hence "dom/include-ignorable-whitespace" feature [false] doesn't work. Thanks, Pavani -- Pavani Mukthipudi Sun Microsystems Inc. Phone: 080 - 2298989 Extn

Re: namespaces feature

> Andy Clark wrote... > > > Rahul Srivastava wrote: > > According to http://www.megginson.com/SAX/Java/namespaces.html, namespaces > > and namespace-prefixes can't be false together. > > > > Xerces allows both the features to set to false together. > > I don't like the way in which the SAX docu

[Xerces2] Recent XNI Changes

I understand (and support) the addition of the Augmentations parameter to calls in the document handler. However, I have one problem and a suggestion. PROBLEM: None of the XNI samples were updated to include this parameter which means that they will not behave as they should. SUGGESTION: Since t

Re: namespaces feature

Rahul Srivastava wrote: > According to http://www.megginson.com/SAX/Java/namespaces.html, namespaces > and namespace-prefixes can't be false together. > > Xerces allows both the features to set to false together. I don't like the way in which the SAX documentation has been changed from saying th