DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6081] - DTD file not found

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Validation according to XML Schema

2002-01-28 Thread Gaurav Bhatnagar
Hello Everybody , I am writing a program to validate a given XML document according to a given set of constraints defined in XML Schema.I want to detect various types of errors occuring in the document such as wrong format of date or time or a field has a value that is out of specified range in

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Andy, I have made the changes required to compile the HEAD branch of jakarta-tomcat-4.0 with either xerces-2_0_)_beta4, or with an earlier version. Based on this experience, I believe that you are oversimplifying the nature of the problem some people might have in implementing this switchover.

Re: Javadoc cleanups

2002-01-28 Thread Theodore W. Leung
Hi Sandy, I cleaned up all the javadoc warnings. The doc that is there could certainly use some additional work, though. Ted On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 08:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Ted, > > I just cleaned up the two schema dv implementations: I moved "xs" package > to a branch, and moved e

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6082] New: - Many encodings are broken in Xerces

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6081] New: - DTD file not found

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Christian Geuer-Pollmann
--On Montag, 28. Januar 2002 15:57 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks like you ran into the same bug the Xalan folks did. I've just > committed a fix that I believe fixes the problem--would you have a chance > to test it? Hi Neil, thanks to Elena and you, xml-security runs perfect with Xer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6046] - Xerces CVS 25-Jan-02 fails Xalan 'build docs'

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6046] - Xerces CVS 25-Jan-02 fails Xalan 'build docs'

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] proposed change to DOMParser

2002-01-28 Thread Theodore W. Leung
Your changes look great. Thanks, Elena Ted On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 09:51, Elena Litani wrote: > "Theodore W. Leung" wrote: > > > > I just committed some changes to the DOMAddLines sample to bring it up > > to DOM L3. > > Thanks! > > > Here's the change that I'd like to make to DOMParser to ge

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread neilg
Hi shane, With any luck, bug #6041 should be dead. I'll take a look at bug #6046 now, but I can't promise anything. :-) Cheers, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/28/2

Re: Xerces 2 release date?

2002-01-28 Thread neilg
Hi Christian, Looks like you ran into the same bug the Xalan folks did. I've just committed a fix that I believe fixes the problem--would you have a chance to test it? Thanks, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Sam Ruby
Andy is correct. The following *simple* patch allows torque to compile with both Xerces 1 and Xerces 2. Index: java/org/apache/torque/engine/database/transform/XmlToAppData.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-turbine-torque/src/jav

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Shane Curcuru
you joseph_kesselman wrote > As far as I know, Xalan's only current serious concern with Xerces2 is bug > 6041, which Neil's got a handle on. If the fix for that will be going into > the Xerces2 production release, I'm content; if not, there's a workaround > we could try to apply but I'm

Re: Xerces 2 release date?

2002-01-28 Thread Christian Geuer-Pollmann
Hi Elena, --On Montag, 28. Januar 2002 13:05 -0500 Elena Litani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian, > > I could reproduce the problem last week, but we can't reproduce it with > X2 build today. > Could you try the latest X2 build and see it is works for you? > http://gump.covalent.net/jars/

Re: Schema grammar

2002-01-28 Thread Elena Litani
Naren Chawla wrote: > 1. Generate a schema grammar from XML Schema file Yes, you can do it with Xerces using DOM L3 Load APIs. > 2. Change the schema grammar programmatically (for e.g., add a new > element) > 3. Generate a modified schema file on the filesystem from the modified > schema gramm

Re: [Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread joseph_kesselman
As far as I know, Xalan's only current serious concern with Xerces2 is bug 6041, which Neil's got a handle on. If the fix for that will be going into the Xerces2 production release, I'm content; if not, there's a workaround we could try to apply but I'm just a hair concerned about whether that wo

RE : [Xerces2] Missing API Changes

2002-01-28 Thread neilg
Hi Andy, Yes, I think the literal value should go down the pipeline, but I don't see why the expanded value needs to. I agree the expandSystemId method should acquire a new home though. Is this something you can live without, or is this a must-have for you? Cheers, Neil Neil Graham XML Parse

RE : [Xerces2] Missing API Changes

2002-01-28 Thread Andy Clark
Neil, You don't think it's important to have the literal system id for the externalEntityDecl or unparsedEntityDecl? I do. It should be expanded and passed along. Currently the code that does that is in the impl.XMLEntityManager class. But it's just a static method and I think perhaps we s

[Xerces2] Stop the Release! -- ALL PROJECTS PLEASE READ

2002-01-28 Thread Andy Clark
Okay, perhaps "Stop the Release!" is a little harsh but I wanted to get your attention. ;) After a long journey, Xerces 2.0.0 is scheduled to be released THIS WEEK! Aren't you excited? I know I am. However... I believe that there are still a few things that need to be straightened out *

Re: [Xerces2] Missing API Changes

2002-01-28 Thread Elena Litani
Andy Clark wrote: > 1) xni/Augmentations > > This interface is missing a way to iterate over items in the > augmentations list. To keep naming consistent, I would suggest the > following: > > int getKeyCount() > String getKeyAt(int index) I will add those methods. > 2) xni/XMLAttri

Re: [Xerces2] Missing API Changes

2002-01-28 Thread neilg
Hi Andy, I'll undertake to make change #5 you suggest--since it's just adding a constructor there won't be much propagation necessary! :-) I'm not sure I agree with change #3 though; in these situations I don't think it ever makes sense to have the literal system Id expanded, since there won't

[Xerces2] Missing API Changes

2002-01-28 Thread Andy Clark
With the impending release of Xerces 2.0.0, I'm seeing a bunch of little things that need to be fixed in XNI and the implementation. For example: 1) xni/Augmentations This interface is missing a way to iterate over items in the augmentations list. To keep naming consistent, I would sugg

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6041] - Problems with newline normalization still persist

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6041] - Problems with newline normalization still persist

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE : [Xerces2] Massive XNI Update

2002-01-28 Thread neilg
Hi Andy, Sorry; thought you'd be following commit logs. I committed a slightly modified version of your changes on the 22nd, IIRC. Cheers, Neil Neil Graham XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6041] - Problems with newline normalization still persist

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6041] - Problems with newline normalization still persist

2002-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu