RE: Proposal: k.Venugopal for committer access

Venu is surely active on xerces-j-dev submitting patches, AWA on xerces-j-user replying queries, both of which looks good to me. My Vote: +1 -Rahul. > -Original Message- > From: Neeraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sub

Re: Bugs 20429 and 20431

Hi Elena , Thanks for committing the patch . Regards venu Elena Litani wrote: Christopher, I agree with your comments. I will bring this issue to the DOM Working Group and make sure it is (if it is not already) addressed in the spec. I will commit the patches from Venu to fix the bu

XML 1.1 Normalization Checking

Hi everyone, This is a heads up for all the Xerces-C and Xerces-J developers. I'm not sure if anyone is already aware of this, but it looks like normalization checking in XML 1.1 might end up on the cutting room floor because no implementations of the feature have been made available yet. See mes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20431] - DOM3: Invalid Boolean Object test in DOMBuilderImpl.setParameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20429] - DOM3: Invalid Boolean Object test in DOMConfigurationImpl.setParameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Testcase for jaxp

Venu I have added the test case as part of the JAXP tests. Thanks for the valuable contribution. Neeraj On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 19:29, K. Venugopal wrote: > Hi , > > Please find updated testcase attached. I have removed dependency on > new xml file and also renamed the class name . > Thanks > ven

Proposal: k.Venugopal for committer access

Hi All, I would like to nominate k.venugopal for committer access. He has provided number of patches in the area of JAXP (also submitted a test case) , DOM, SAX etc. He also worked on the long pending issue of correcting the attribute related error messages. Besides that he is also active

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20471] - SAXParseException derivation-ok-restriction.2.2 when using XMLSchema restriction

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Testcase for jaxp

Return Receipt Your Testcase for jaxp document :

Re: Testcase for jaxp

Hi , Please find updated testcase attached. I have removed dependency on new xml file and also renamed the  class name . Thanks venu K. Venugopal wrote: Hi , Please find testcase attached which checks for following scenarios as per JAXP 1.2 specification. 1.Parser(SAX and DOM) should