Hello,
For what it's worth, just before the Xerces-J 2.0.0 release I ran some tests that showed a significant difference between a parse with the schema validator in the pipeline and one without it in the pipeline, even when there was no schema grammar to validate.
The results I saw we
Hallo, John, Eric,
thanks all for your answers. Now i uses to
include basic type definition and uses
to extend some others. It works, although it is not perfect
as "inherited schemas". I found that some other description
languages, such as RDF, could support such special features.
thanks again
Title: RE: Schema inheritance??
Point taken. is the only one that comes close.
and "give" you all the definitions from the other schema which give you resue, rather than inheritance. Liberal use of abstract types and elements and subsitution groups in the including schema give some level
Since the topic of parsing HTML has come up again recently, I
posted a new version of the NekoHTML parser for Xerces2 to my
website. This version fixes a few bugs and adds some convenient
DOM and SAX parser classes so it's a little easier to use
directly.
If anyone's interested, it's located a
Answering my own question:
org.apache.xerces.impl.Version
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Börkel
> Sent: Dienstag, 2. April 2002 10:05
> To: Xerces Mailinglist
> Subject: How to find out the version of Xerces programmatically?
>
>
> HI!
>
> How can I find out the version of Xerces
HI!
How can I find out the version of Xerces that my program uses? Is there some
kind of main class with a version string?
Thanks!
Regards,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
I don't get it.
setSystemId() actually change your input file name.
Not DTD file name.
How exactly you did it?
Andrew Duan
Escalate, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Thornton, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:40 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: SAX - Fo
Jose Emanuel Palmeiro wrote:
> I'm parsing an html file with sax, and an error is thrown when an
> entity is found. The error thrown is "The entity 'nbsp' was
> referenced, but not declared". How can i extract this expresssion
> ( or other with &) without an error thrown.
XML parsers can *not*
Eric Hodges wrote:
> That's odd, since the document can be parsed if I remove the encoding
> directive and the single Unicode character I added to test it. Any ideas for
> finding the error in the document that only shows up when I try to use UTF-16
> encoding?
My guess would be pilot error. Some
"Thornton, Marc" wrote:
> Any caveats anyone is aware of in using this solution? I know that when I
> already had a DTD declaration in my XML, I received an error based on the
> format of the header (either DOCTYPE or ?xml version info) when I used this
> approach.
What you really want to do you
10 matches
Mail list logo