[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/06/2004 05:23:42 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I uses Xerces2 for XML Schema API. However, there are other parts of our
> system that are certified to work with only xerces 1.x. Wondering if I
> switch out the 1.x with 2.x, will the old code that uses xerces 1.x
> continue to work?
Hi,
I uses Xerces2 for XML Schema API. However, there are other parts of our
system that are certified to work with only xerces 1.x. Wondering if I
switch out the 1.x with 2.x, will the old code that uses xerces 1.x
continue to work? In other words, is Xerces2 backward compatible?
Alternatively,
If this was all you had to use, you would be safe to invalidate B and A if C
changed. A certainly depends on C, and B possibly. X,Y and Z cannot depend
on C if C is not in the pool already. The tricky part is what to do if Y
changes, since A, B and/or C might depend on it. I'm not sure there's
Wish it were that easy. After parsing the instance document, the grammar
pool holds X,Y,Z,A,B,C. Now C is changed, and the resulting parse
replaces C in the grammar pool. Which others should be invalidated?
Multiple namespaces may be involved. It is not certain from this
information there is an
You would find out, for example, that
Before parsing A.xsd, the grammar pool held X,Y,Z
After parsing A, it held X,Y,Z,A,B,C.
So B,C were imported during the parse of A. You could save dependency trees
based on this information.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Foster" <[EMAIL PROT
Jeff Greif wrote:
Another not-very-appealing possibility is to iterate over the grammar pool
before and after parsing the document or root schema and look at the change.
I'm not sure what I would find out from this.
This assumes the grammar pool is not used by multiple threads.
It is, but I have a
Another not-very-appealing possibility is to iterate over the grammar pool
before and after parsing the document or root schema and look at the change.
This assumes the grammar pool is not used by multiple threads.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMA
Yes, you could do that. Then if you had seen a sequence of schemas and
later one of these changed you could just throw away everying in the
sequence preceding the changed schema. Assuming that which schema
changes is somewhat random, you will, on average, throw away half of the
cache related to
Hi,
Maybe I'm being naïve, but couldn't you get the dependency information
by using an EntityResolver? I guess you wouldn't be able to tell the difference
between [A includes B includes C] and [A includes B and C], but it would give
you a rough idea and since it's really the 't
Hello George and Martin,
lots of thanks for You for Your rapid answers! :)
I think I will use an XSLT processor...
Kind regards,
Csaba Szucs
George Cristian Bina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/06/2004 01:06 PM
Please respond to xerces-j-user
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Csaba,
For XSLT 2.0 there is a schema in the spec.
XSLT 1.0 has only a DTD in the spec but you can use TRANG for instance
to convert it to a schema.
If your task is to validate XSLT then a better approach is o use an XSLT
processor to do that. It will check more that a validation against a
s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean, I need an xsd file for the XSLT part of XSL specification
Does it exist somewhere?
There is a DTD in appendices of W3C XSLT specification. However DTD
cannot describe rules such as 'any element not from XSLT namespace'
hence it cannot describe XSLT correctly.
I mean, I need an xsd file for the XSLT part of XSL specification
Does it exist somewhere?
Kind regards,
Csaba Szucs
- Forwarded by Csaba Szucs/ve/eu/au/cag on 12/06/2004 12:37 PM -
Csaba Szucs
12/06/2004 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Hello Xerces Users,
I would like to (schema)-validate XSL files. Does an .xsd file exist for the XML document type of XSL files? Where can I download it from?
Thanks,
Kind regards,
Csaba Szucs
Read this:
http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/faq-sax.html#faq-2
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Suresh Babu Koya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:42 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; IndianAtTech
>>Subject: RE: Regarding characters function
>>
>>
>>You have to collect all
could u please provide me an example
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:41:39 +0530, Suresh Babu Koya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have to collect all the string data and process all that
> data in the endElement method.
>
> /Suresh
>
>
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: IndianAtTech [mailto:
You have to collect all the string data and process all that
data in the endElement method.
/Suresh
>>-Original Message-
>>From: IndianAtTech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:20 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Regarding characters function
>>
>>
>>Hello
Hello All,
How many times the characters functions is called, if the value in
XML set as multiline data
When I have tested the following code snippet, I am not getting all
the multi line data in single shot. characters function is calling
multiple times. I don't know where to end for single elem
There is a bug in Xerces 2.6.x which causes the external schema location
properties to be ignored if the values of features/properties do not
change between parses. This has been fixed for a while now in CVS.
Without a schema location another way to locate your schema is with an
entity resolver
19 matches
Mail list logo
