RE: Modifying schema validation

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Woon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Modifying schema validation Mark Feblowitz wrote: > Something that I've asked around about but have not yet had time to > pursue mysel

RE: feature / enhancement request for schema validation

2002-06-19 Thread Mark Feblowitz
r.println(" -s | -STurn on/off Schema validation support."); System.err.println(" NOTE: Not supported by all parsers."); System.err.println(" -f | -F Turn on/off Schema full checking."); Mark Feblowitz

RE: Modifying schema validation

2002-06-13 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Comments below... -Original Message- From: Eddie Robertsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:52 PM To: Mark Feblowitz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Michael Rowell (E-mail) Subject:Re: Modifying schema validation

RE: Modifying schema validation

2002-06-12 Thread Mark Feblowitz
trying to think it all through too quickly. Have any thoughts? Thanks again for your offer. If my ramblings have made things sound too complicated, just ignore them and do what you had originally proposed. We can noodle the rest. Thanks again, Mark Mark Feblowitz

RE: Modifying schema validation

2002-06-11 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Title: RE: Modifying schema validation I noticed the part about the Schematron-encoded constraints being "embedded in the XSD." Is this a hard requirement, or can the constraints be included, using a standard Schema include?   Thanks,   Mark     Mark

RE: Modifying schema validation

2002-06-07 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Title: RE: Modifying schema validation John –   Something that I've asked around about but have not yet had time to pursue myself: getting Xalan to both validate the incoming XML doc against its respective schema *and* having it apply Schematron constraints, within the context of a sing

RE: Validation with Schema with xs:include - Error

2002-05-02 Thread Mark Feblowitz
I believe it means that you didn't use standard URI format. Windoze-only-based tools cheat and let you use Windows paths, but that's not what the Rec calls for. Try: Mark Mark Feblowitz XML Architect [t] 61

RE: XML Schema validation using XERCES --- the correct mailing li st to get this question answered...

2002-04-30 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Huh? -Original Message- From: Ibrahim Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: XML Schema validation using XERCES --- the correct mailing list to get this question answered... --

RE: AW: unparsed data in XML

2002-04-29 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Mark Feblowitz [t] 617.715.7231 XML Architect [f] 617.495.0188 Frictionless Commerce Incorporated [e] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 400 Technology Square, 9th Floor Cambridge, MA

RE: AW: unparsed data in XML

2002-04-29 Thread Mark Feblowitz
that might mess up the parse. ---- Mark Feblowitz [t] 617.715.7231 XML Architect [f] 617.495.0188 Frictionless Commerce Incorporated [e] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Can Xalan-j validate xml doc against schema

2002-04-25 Thread Mark Feblowitz
Xalan. I just need to know how to get Xalan to validate before running transforms. Is there sample code anywhere? Is there an archive for me to search for this? I notice there isn't yet an FAQ. Thanks, Mark ---- -